Title of article :
Is Clarivate’s Web of Science Still Unable to Identify Review Papers Correctly? Evidence, Implications, and Potential Solutions
Author/Authors :
Moussa ، Salim Institut Supérieur des Études Appliquées en Humanités - Marketting University of Gafsa
From page :
351
To page :
362
Abstract :
This paper presents a study of 97 papers classified as review papers by Clarivate’s Web of Science. The 97 peer-reviewed papers were published in three prestigious information and library science journals. According to the findings, 57 of the 97 alleged reviews are genuine. 37 research articles, brief communication, case studies, and film reviews are among the 40 papers mislabeled as reviews. The author identifies the causes of these misclassifications, discusses the implications of these misclassifications, and suggests potential solutions to avoid them.
Keywords :
Web of Science , misclassification , review papers
Journal title :
International Journal of Information Science and Management (IJISM)
Journal title :
International Journal of Information Science and Management (IJISM)
Record number :
2746598
Link To Document :
بازگشت