Title of article :
Initial Prospective Study of Ambulatory Mini-Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy on Upper Urinary TractCalculi
Author/Authors :
tian, ye guizhou provincial people’s hospital - department of urology, Guizhou, China , yang, xiushu guizhou provincial people’s hospital - department of urology, Guizhou, China , luo, guangheng guizhou provincial people’s hospital - department of urology, Guizhou,, China , sun, zhaolin guizhou provincial people’s hospital - department of urology, Guizhou, China
Abstract :
Purpose: To explore the feasibility and safety of ambulatory mPCNL (mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy) on upper urinary tract calculi.Methods: Clinical data of 18 patients who received ambulatory mPCNL during Auguest 2017 to January 2018 and 23 patients who were treated with routine inpatient mPCNL of the corresponding period were collected. All the patients included received 16Fr channel PCNL under the guidance of Doppler ultrasound. A 6Fr double J stent was placed in the ureter for internal drainage, and either an indwelling 14Fr open nephrostomy tube was placed or the puncture channel was filled with absorbable hemostatic materials alone, depending on the bleeding condition of the puncture channel and the intraoperative conditions. Preoperative parameters and surgery time, complications, total hospitalization costs and hospital stay time between the two groups were compared. Results: Preoperative parameters regarding age (P = 0.057), sex distribution (P = 0.380), ASA score (P = 0.388), Calculi CT value (P = 0.697), and the S.T.O.N.E. score (P=0.122) were comparable between the two groups. Max-imum diameter of calculi (cm) of the conventional hospitalization group, however, was larger than the ambulatory surgery group (P = 0.041). There were no significant differences in the mean surgery time (P = 0.146), postoper-ative hemoglobin drop (P = 0.865), Calculi-free rate on the next day after surgery (P = 0.083) and postoperative fever rate (P=0.200) between the two groups. With regard to tubeless rate (P 0.001), total hospitalization costs (P = 0.003) and hospital stay time (P 0.001), there were significant advantage favoring ambulatory mPCNL. Conclusion: For patients with simple upper urinary tract calculi and relatively good performance status, ambula-tory mPCNL is feasible as it’s equally safe and efficient as compared with routine inpatient mPCNL. Moreover, ambulatory mPCNL decreases hospitalization costs and hospital stay time. Nevertheless, perioperative manage-ment should be carefully conducted, and well-designed studies are warranted.
Keywords :
ambulatory surgery , mPCNL , renal calculi , safety
Journal title :
Urology Journal
Journal title :
Urology Journal