Title of article
A Comparative Study on the Clinical Efficacy of Modified Circumcision and Two Other Types ofCircumcision
Author/Authors
su, quanxin dalian medical university, Liaoning, China , su, quanxin nanjing medical university - affiliated changzhou no. 2 people’s hospital - department of urology, Jiangsu, China , gao, shenglin nanjing medical university - affiliated changzhou no. 2 people’s hospital - department of urology, Jiangsu, China , chen, jiasheng nanjing medical university - affiliated changzhou no. 2 people’s hospital - department of urology, Jiangsu, China , lu, chao nanjing medical university - affiliated changzhou no. 2 people’s hospital - department of urology, Jiangsu, China , mao, weijiang nanjing medical university - affiliated changzhou no. 2 people’s hospital - department of urology, Jiangsu, China , wu, xingyu nanjing medical university - affiliated changzhou no. 2 people’s hospital - department of urology, Jiangsu, China , zhang, lifeng nanjing medical university - affiliated changzhou no. 2 people’s hospital - department of urology, Jiangsu, China , zuo, li nanjing medical university - affiliated changzhou no. 2 people’s hospital - department of urology, Jiangsu, China
From page
556
To page
560
Abstract
Purpose: To compare the clinical effects of three methods of circumcision: modified circumcision, traditional circumcision, and disposable suturing device circumcision. Materials and Methods: Male patients (n = 241) with redundant prepuce and/or phimosis were included in a clinical trial from January 2019 to March 2020. Patients were divided into 3 groups based on the surgical method: group A, traditional circumcision (n = 79); group B, modified circumcision (n = 80); and group C, disposable suturing device circumcision (n = 82). Results: The operation times in groups A, B, and C were 25.2 ± 3.3 min, 10.2 ± 2.7 min, and 6.7 ± 1.4 min, respectively. The volumes of intraoperative blood loss in groups A, B, and C were 12.7 ± 2.3 mL, 8.1 ± 3.4 mL, and 2.2 ± 0.8 mL, respectively (P 0.05). Groups A and B were superior to group C in terms of the 6-h postoperative visual analog scale score and appearance satisfaction (P 0.05). There were no obvious differences in the 7-day postoperative pain score and total healing time (P 0.05). The operating expenses in groups A and B were lower than that in group C (P 0.05). Conclusion: Modified circumcision, with its advantages of shorter operation time, less blood loss and pain, lower cost, and better postoperative penile appearance, is easily accepted by patients and deserves wide clinical application.
Keywords
redundant prepuce , phimosis , disposable circumcision suture devices , postoperative complications
Journal title
Urology Journal
Journal title
Urology Journal
Record number
2749619
Link To Document