Author/Authors :
Firouzi ، Ata Cardiovascular intervention research center, Rajaie Cardiovascular Medical and Research Center - Iran University of Medical Sciences , Hosseini ، Zahra Cardiovascular intervention research center, Rajaie Cardiovascular Medical and Research Center - Iran University of Medical Sciences , Norouzi ، Zeinab Cardiovascular intervention research center, Rajaie Cardiovascular Medical and Research Center - Iran University of Medical Sciences , Hosseini ، Zohre Cardiovascular intervention research center, Rajaie Cardiovascular Medical and Research Center - Iran University of Medical Sciences , Amirpour ، Afshin Cardiovascular Research Institute - Isfahan University of Medical Sciences , Talakoob ، Hamed Cardiovascular Research Center - Alborz University of Medical Sciences , Amin ، Arash Lorestan Heart Center, Madani Hospital - Lorestan University of Medical Sciences , Soleimani ، Abbas Sina Hospital - Tehran University of Medical Sciences (TUMS) , Moradifar ، Nasrolah Lorestan Heart Center, Madani Hospital - Lorestan University of Medical Sciences , Karbalai ، Shahrokh Sina Hospital - Tehran University of Medical Sciences (TUMS) , Mozafarybazargani ، Mohammadhosseini Cardiovascular Research Center - Alborz University of Medical Sciences , Hekmat ، Hamidreza Ziaeian Hospital - Tehran University of Medical Sciences , Maleki ، Majid Cardiovascular intervention research center, Rajaie Cardiovascular Medical and Research Center - Iran University of Medical Sciences , Sadeghipour ، Parham Cardiovascular intervention research center, Rajaie Cardiovascular Medical and Research Center - Iran University of Medical Sciences , Mirbod ، Mahnaz Cardiovascular Research Institute - Isfahan University of Medical Sciences , Ghorbanpoor Kohnaki ، Mina Cardiovascular Intervention Research Center, Rajaie Cardiovascular Medical and Research Center - Iran University of Medical Sciences , Bakhshandeh ، Hooman Cardiovascular intervention research center, Rajaie Cardiovascular Medical and Research Center - Iran University of Medical Sciences , KalaeiNia ، Masoomeh Cardiovascular intervention research center, Rajaie Cardiovascular Medical and Research Center - Iran University of Medical Sciences , Habibizade ، Fatemeh Sadat Cardiovascular intervention research center, Rajaie Cardiovascular Medical and Research Center - Iran University of Medical Sciences , Iraninejad ، Sara Cardiovascular intervention research center, Rajaie Cardiovascular Medical and Research Center - Iran University of Medical Sciences , Baay ، Mohammadreza Cardiovascular intervention research center, Rajaie Cardiovascular Medical and Research Center - Iran University of Medical Sciences , Khalilipur ، Ehsan Cardiovascular intervention research center, Rajaie Cardiovascular Medical and Research Center - Iran University of Medical Sciences
Abstract :
Background: Limited data exist on the clinical outcomes of patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) presenting with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Methods: This multicenter study, conducted in 6 centers in Iran, aimed to compare baseline clinical and procedural data between a case group, comprising STEMI patients with COVID-19, and a control group, comprising STEMI patients before the COVID-19 pandemic, and to determine in-hospital infarct-related artery thrombus grades and major adverse cardiocerebrovascular events (MACCEs), defined as a composite of deaths from any cause (cardiovascular and noncardiovascular), nonfatal strokes, and stent thrombosis. Results: No significant differences were observed between the 2 groups regarding baseline characteristics. Primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) was performed in 72.9% of the cases and 98.5% of the controls (P=0.043), and primary coronary artery bypass grafting was performed in 6.2% of the cases and 1.4% of the controls (P=0.048). Successful PPCI procedures (final TIMI flow grade III) were significantly fewer in the case group (66.5% vs 93.5%; P=0.001). The baseline thrombus grade before wire crossing was not statistically significantly different between the 2 groups. The summation of thrombus grades IV and V was 75% in the case group and 82% in the control group (P=0.432). The rate of MACCEs was 14.5% and 2.1% in the case and control groups, respectively (P=0.002). Conclusion: In our study, the thrombus grade had no significant differences between the case and control groups; however, the in-hospital rates of the no-reflow phenomenon, periprocedural MI, mechanical complications, and MACCEs were statistically significantly higher in the case group.
Keywords :
ST , segment , elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) , COVID , 19 , Thrombus burden , Primary PCI