Title of article :
Comparing RT-qPCR and Hepatitis C Virus Antigen Detection Assay for Detecting Active Infection in Blood Donors in Fars Province, Iran
Author/Authors :
Kasraian ، Leila Blood Transfusion Research Centre - High Institute for Research and Education in Transfusion Medicine , Farhadi ، Ali Diagnostic Laboratory Sciences and Technology Research Center, School of Paramedical Sciences - Shiraz University of Medical Sciences , Rafiei Dehbidi ، Gholamreza Diagnostic Laboratory Sciences and Technology Research Center, School of Paramedical Sciences - Shiraz University of Medical Sciences , Mirzakhani ، Mehdi Fars Blood Transfusion Organization , Sharifzadeh ، Sedigheh Diagnostic Laboratory Sciences and Technology Research Center, School of Paramedical Sciences - Shiraz University of Medical Sciences , Namdari ، Sepide Diagnostic Laboratory Sciences and Technology Research Center, School of Paramedical Sciences - Shiraz University of Medical Sciences , Behzad-Behbahani ، Abbas Diagnostic Laboratory Sciences and Technology Research Center, School of Paramedical Sciences - Shiraz University of Medical Sciences
From page :
1
To page :
6
Abstract :
Background: Immunoassay is still used to detect hepatitis C virus (HCV) antibodies in donated blood in many developing countries. However, an immunoblotting confirmation test is needed to confirm positive results. Objectives: We compared the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of nucleic acid testing and HCV core antigen (HCVcAg) detection in the serum samples of blood donors with HCV antibodies to determine active infection. Methods: Overall, 90 serum samples from blood donors referred to Fars Blood Transfusion Organization, Iran during March 2017-March 2019 and initially tested for HCV antibodies were included in the study. Enzyme immunoassays were used to detect the HCV antigen and anti-HCV antibody. A commercial reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) kit was used to quantify HCV RNA. The HCV genotypes were also determined by DNA sequencing. In order to compare the HCVcAg detection method with the RT-qPCR reference method, sensitivity, specificity, performance, PPV, and NPV were calculated. Results: Out of 90 serum samples, 73 were positive for anti-HCV antibody, and 17 sera were negative. The HCV RNA was detected in 60 (82%) of anti-HCV antibody-positive samples, whereas the HCVcAg test detected HCV antigen in 54 (74%) of the samples, indicating a significant correlation between the two assays (r = 0.86). The overall sensitivity and specificity for HCVcAg detection method were 93.85% [95% confidence interval (CI): 84.99 - 98.3%] and 100% (95% CI: 94.64 - 100%), respectively. Based on the statistical analysis, the accuracy of the antigen detection test was 94.83% (95% CI: 87.26 - 98.58%). Moreover, the agreement between HCV RNA detection using RT-qPCR and HCVcAg detection was 97.78% (kappa value: 0.94). Conclusions: The sensitivity and specificity of HCVcAg detection in blood donors were ideal compared to the RT-qPCR reference method. However, the method should be tested on more HCV antibody-positive and -negative samples. Furthermore, our study revealed a significant association between the number of RT-qPCR-positive cases and the cases diagnosed by the HCVcAg detection method for screening and detecting active HCV infection in blood donors.
Keywords :
HCV Core , Hepatitis C Virus , RT , qPCR , Sensitivity
Journal title :
Hepatitis Monthly
Journal title :
Hepatitis Monthly
Record number :
2767004
Link To Document :
بازگشت