• Title of article

    Stakeholder Perspectives of Attributes and Features of Context Relevant to Knowledge Translation in Health Settings: A Multi-Country Analysis

  • Author/Authors

    Squires ، Janet E. Department of Health Sciences - School of Nursing - University of Ottawa , Hutchinson ، Alison m. Monash Health , Coughlin ، Mary Clinical Epidemiology Program - Ottawa Hospital Research Institute , Bashir ، Kainat Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation - University of Toronto , Curran ، Janet Faculty of Health, School of Nursing - Dalhousie University , Grimshaw ، Jeremy M. Clinical Epidemiology Program - Ottawa Hospital Research Institute , Dorrance ، Kristin Statistics Canada , Aloisio ، Laura Clinical Epidemiology Program - Ottawa Hospital Research Institute , Brehaut ، Jamie School of Epidemiology and Public Health - University of Ottawa , Francis ، Jill j. School of Health Sciences - University of Melbourne , Ivers ، Noah Women’s College Hospital , Lavis ، John McMaster University , Michie ، Susan University College London , Hillmer ، Michael Ontario Ministry of Health and LongTerm Care , Noseworthy ، Thomas University of Calgary , Vine ، Jocelyn IWK Health Centre , Graham ، Ian D. Clinical Epidemiology Program - Ottawa Hospital Research Institute

  • From page
    1373
  • To page
    1390
  • Abstract
    Background  Context is recognized as important to successful knowledge translation (KT) in health settings. What is meant by context, however, is poorly understood. The purpose of the current study was to elicit tacit knowledge about what is perceived to constitute context by conducting interviews with a variety of health system stakeholders internationally so as to compile a comprehensive list of contextual attributes and their features relevant to KT in healthcare. Methods  A descriptive qualitative study design was used. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with health system stakeholders (change agents/KT specialists and KT researchers) in four countries: Australia, Canada, the United Kingdom, and the United States. Interview transcripts were analyzed using inductive thematic content analysis in four steps: (1) selection of utterances describing context, (2) coding of features of context, (3) categorizing of features into attributes of context, (4) comparison of attributes and features by: country, KT experience, and role. Results  A total of 39 interviews were conducted. We identified 66 unique features of context, categorized into 16 attributes. One attribute, Facility Characteristics, was not represented in previously published KT frameworks. We found instances of all 16 attributes in the interviews irrespective of country, level of experience with KT, and primary role (change agent/KT specialist vs. KT researcher), revealing robustness and transferability of the attributes identified. We also identified 30 new context features (across 13 of the 16 attributes). Conclusion  The findings from this study represent an important advancement in the KT field; we provide much needed conceptual clarity in context, which is essential to the development of common assessment tools to measure context to determine which context attributes and features are more or less important in different contexts for improving KT success.
  • Keywords
    Context , Knowledge Translation , Implementation
  • Journal title
    International Journal of Health Policy and Management(IJHPM)
  • Journal title
    International Journal of Health Policy and Management(IJHPM)
  • Record number

    2770293