Title of article :
Impact of Gender, Change of Base of Support, and Visual Deprivation on Postural Balance Control in Young, Healthy Subjects
Author/Authors :
Ghram ، Amine Healthy Living for Pandemic Event Protection (HL – PIVOT) Network , Abidi ، Sirine Research Laboratory Education, Motricity, Sport and Health LR19JS01 - High Institute of Sport and Physical Education of Sfax - University of Sfax , Ben Abdessamie ، Amal Laboratory ‘Motricity, Interactions, Performance’ (EA 4334) - University of Le Mans , Weiss ، Katja Institute of Primary Care - University of Zurich , Dammak ، Mohamed Sports Affairs Department - Qatar University , Jribi ، Salma Nord Essonne Hospital Group , Yahia ، Abdelmoneem Research Laboratory of Evaluation and Management of Musculoskeletal System Pathologies, LR20ES09 - University of Sfax , Ghroubi ، Sameh Research Laboratory of Evaluation and Management of Musculoskeletal System Pathologies, LR20ES09 - University of Sfax , Elleuch ، Mohamed Habib Research Laboratory of Evaluation and Management of Musculoskeletal System Pathologies, LR20ES09 - University of Sfax , Knechtle ، Beat Institute of Primary Care - University of Zurich
From page :
1
To page :
10
Abstract :
Background: Vision, vestibular sense, proprioception and muscle strength are required to maintain balance. However, gender could also play a crucial role in postural sway. Objectives: This study was used to examine (i) the impact of gender, surface type, and vision on postural sway; (ii) the effects of gender and vision on the limb symmetry of postural sway; and (iii) to understand the effects of gender, stance, surface type and vision on the alterations of dynamic postural sway alterations. Methods: This was a cross-sectional study in which young, healthy men (n = 15) and women (n = 12) underwent a balance control assessment using a force plate (SATEL, 40 Hz). Postural stances were evaluated in different conditions: Opened eyes (EO) and closed eyes (EC), on different surface foam vs. firm, a dominant leg stance (DL) vs. a non-dominant leg stance (NDL), and a mediolateral stance (ML) vs. an anteroposterior stance (AP). The mediolateral sway (ML sway), anteroposterior sway (AP sway), and sway area were calculated from the centre of pressure displacements. Results: ML sway, AP sway and sway area increased when eyes were closed (P 0.000). Foam surface perturbs balance control more than firm surface under EO and EC conditions for both genders, as observed in the AP sway curve (P 0.000). A functional symmetry exists between the DL and NDL for all sway parameters: The ML sway, AP sway, and sway area (P = 0.720; P = 0.292; P = 0.954). The AP stance is more stable for the ML sway than the ML stance for both genders (P 0.001). For the AP sway, the ML stance is more stable than the AP sway AP direction stance for both genders (P 0.001). Women were significantly more stable than men in the ML stance when vision was absent (P 0.01). Conclusions: Postural sway was altered more significantly on a foam surface than on a firm surface and symmetry between the DL and NDL was observed. Furthermore, we concluded that women have better dynamic balance control than men.
Keywords :
Posture , Balance , Functional Symmetry , Visual Condition , Gender Differences
Journal title :
International Journal of Sport Studies for Health
Journal title :
International Journal of Sport Studies for Health
Record number :
2777316
Link To Document :
بازگشت