Title of article :
Comparison of Sodium Lauryl Ether Sulfate and Sodium Dodecyl Sulfate in the Intestinal Decellularization of Rats Using a Histological Method and Confocal Raman Microscopy
Author/Authors :
Asadi‐Yousefabad ، Hossein Student Research Committee, Faculty of Medicine - Hormozgan University of Medical Sciences , Daneshi ، Sajad Stem Cells Technology Research Center - Shiraz University of Medical Sciences , Pourentezari ، Majid Department of Biology Anatomical Sciences - Yazd Neuroendocrine Research Center - Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences , Tanideh ، Nader Department of Pharmacology - Stem Cells Technology Research Center, Shiraz Medical School - Shiraz University of Medical Sciences , Zamani Rarani ، Mohammad Department of Anatomical Sciences - Faculty of Medicine, Molecular Medicine Research Center, Hormozgan Health Institute - Hormozgan University of Medical Sciences , Dortaj ، Hengameh Department of Tissue Engineering and Applied Cell Science - Shiraz University of Applied Medical Science and Technologies , Salari ، Mojtaba Student Research Committee, Faculty of Medicine - Hormozgan University of Medical Sciences , Sharifian Dastjerdi ، Zeinolabedin Department of Anatomical Sciences - Faculty of Medicine, Molecular Medicine Research Center, Hormozgan Health Institute - Hormozgan University of Medical Sciences
From page :
86
To page :
91
Abstract :
Background: Sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) detergent is widely used in tissue decellularization to produce scaffolds for tissue engineering. Despite its strong decellularization, this substance has relatively high toxicity and causes changes in tissue composition. Sodium lauryl ether sulfate (SLES) is a new poly anionic detergent that is less toxic than SDS but weaker than it. The present study aimed to decellularize the intestinal tissue using SDS and SLES solutions, forming a cell scaffold, and examining scaffolds obtained from this tissue. Methods: Eighteen male Sprague-Dawley rats were divided into three groups. The intestines of all rats were removed after anesthesia. In the first group (controls), rats’ intestines were placed in a 10% formalin solution. In the second group, intestines were decellularized using an SLES solution. In the third group animals’ intestines were decellularized using an SDS solution. To evaluate decellularization, samples were stained with hematoxylin-eosin staining and Alcian blue staining for glycosaminoglycans (GAGs), and Masson’s trichrome for collagen fibers. A confocal Raman microscope was used to compare collagen, lipid, GAG, and genetic content. Results: Hematoxylin-eosin staining showed that the nucleus and DNA were removed in the decellularized scaffolds by SDS or SLES. The SLES group, compared to the SDS group, showed fewer changes in the epithelial tissue, and muscle layers in both scaffolds were well preserved. The results of confocal Raman microscopy showed that tryptophan, lipid, glycogen, and protein were broken down by both detergents; however, the residual amount of glycogen was the same in both substances, but disulfide bonds of proteins, hydroxyproline, and lipids in the decellularized intestine with SLES were mostly preserved. Conclusion: Both substances were suitable for intestinal decellularization and removed the overall structure of intestinal tissue, but SLES retained collagen and GAG content better than SDS.
Keywords :
Tissue engineering , Intestinal failure , Tissue scaffolds , Decellularized extracellular matrix , Sodium dodecyl sulfate
Journal title :
Journal of Kerman University of Medical Sciences (JKMU)
Journal title :
Journal of Kerman University of Medical Sciences (JKMU)
Record number :
2778277
Link To Document :
بازگشت