Autocorrelation structure of forecast errors from time-series models: Alternative assessments of the causes of post-earnings announcement drift

This paper demonstrates that the evidence supporting the hypothesis that post-earnings announcement drift (PEAD) is caused by investorsʹ failure to incorporate the implications of current earnings for future earnings is (also) consistent with researchersʹ over-differencing an already stationary time-series. Specifically, we show the evidence is driven by a subset of firms where over-differencing of quarterly earnings in estimating earnings surprises is most likely to have occurred. Given the persistence of the PEAD over time, our alternative explanation suggests that the prior research investigating the causes for the PEAD overestimates investorsʹ naivete.