Author/Authors :
Nielsen، نويسنده , , A. A.، نويسنده ,
Abstract :
This paper describes new extensions to the previously
published multivariate alteration detection (MAD) method for
change detection in bi-temporal, multi- and hypervariate data
such as remote sensing imagery. Much like boosting methods
often applied in data mining work, the iteratively reweighted
(IR) MAD method in a series of iterations places increasing
focus on “difficult” observations, here observations whose change
status over time is uncertain. The MAD method is based on the
established technique of canonical correlation analysis: for the
multivariate data acquired at two points in time and covering
the same geographical region, we calculate the canonical variates
and subtract them from each other. These orthogonal differences
contain maximum information on joint change in all variables
(spectral bands). The change detected in this fashion is invariant to
separate linear (affine) transformations in the originally measured
variables at the two points in time, such as 1) changes in gain and
offset in the measuring device used to acquire the data, 2) data
normalization or calibration schemes that are linear (affine) in
the gray values of the original variables, or 3) orthogonal or
other affine transformations, such as principal component (PC)
or maximum autocorrelation factor (MAF) transformations. The
IR-MAD method first calculates ordinary canonical and original
MAD variates. In the following iterations we apply different
weights to the observations, large weights being assigned to
observations that show little change, i.e., for which the sum of
squared, standardized MAD variates is small, and small weights
being assigned to observations for which the sum is large. Like the
original MAD method, the iterative extension is invariant to linear
(affine) transformations of the original variables. To stabilize
solutions to the (IR-)MAD problem, some form of regularization
may be needed. This is especially useful for work on hyperspectral
data. This paper describes ordinary two-set canonical correlation
analysis, the MAD transformation, the iterative extension, and
three regularization schemes. A simple case with real Landsat
Thematic Mapper (TM) data at one point in time and (partly)
constructed data at the other point in time that demonstrates the
superiority of the iterative scheme over the original MAD method
is shown. Also, examples with SPOT High Resolution Visible data
from an agricultural region in Kenya, and hyperspectral airborne
HyMap data from a small rural area in southeastern Germany are
given. The latter case demonstrates the need for regularization.
Keywords :
Canonical correlation analysis (CCA) , regularization or penalization , MADtransformation , iterativelyreweighted multivariate alteration detection (IR-MAD) , remote sensing.