Author/Authors :
Garnacho، نويسنده , , F. Perez، نويسنده , , J. Aro، نويسنده , , M. Valve، نويسنده , , P. Schon، نويسنده , , K. Kato، نويسنده , , T. McComb، نويسنده , , T.R. Pesavento، نويسنده , , G. Hauschild، نويسنده , , W. Gockenbach، نويسنده , , E. Ramirez، نويسنده , , M. Munoz، نويسنده , , P.E. Larzelere، نويسنده , , B. Xin Zhang، نويسنده , , Y. ، نويسنده ,
Abstract :
Definitions of standards IEC 60 and IEEE Std 4 are
insufficient for the evaluation of lightning impulsc parameters
of waveforms with oscillations andor overshoot. This has
brought about different interpretations in the estimation of
these parameters, especially when using digital recorders.
Large discrepancies havc resulted from the different
interpretations.
The working group 33.03 of CIGRE has collected
various opinions about this problem. These are presented,
analysed and discussed in this paper. Different ways of
determining mean curves of impulses with oscillations and/or
overshoot are proposed. In addition, different alternatives for
the definitions of overshoot amplitude and duration are
suggested for impulses with overshoot.
The problems and alternative solutions are discussed
in the light of analyzing three impulses of the IEC Test Data
Generator. This illustrates clearly the need to change the
above mentioned standards. Simple, easily applicable,
reproducible and technically justified definitions are required
in order to take advantage of the accuracy and facilities of
digital recorders in impulse measurements. This paper offers
the basis for further discussion on the subject before WG
33 03 of CIGRE makes its final proposal. Further studies with
practical test impulses are still needed.