Title of article
Spatialization Design: Comparing Points and Landscapes
Author/Authors
Tory، نويسنده , , M.، نويسنده , , Sprague، نويسنده , , D.W.، نويسنده , , Fuqu Wu، نويسنده , , Wing Yan So، نويسنده , , Munzner، نويسنده , , T.، نويسنده ,
Issue Information
روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2007
Pages
8
From page
1262
To page
1269
Abstract
Spatializations represent non-spatial data using a spatial layout similar to a map. We present an experiment comparing
different visual representations of spatialized data, to determine which representations are best for a non-trivial search and point
estimation task. Primarily, we compare point-based displays to 2D and 3D information landscapes. We also compare a colour (hue)
scale to a grey (lightness) scale. For the task we studied, point-based spatializations were far superior to landscapes, and 2D
landscapes were superior to 3D landscapes. Little or no benefit was found for redundantly encoding data using colour or greyscale
combined with landscape height. 3D landscapes with no colour scale (height-only) were particularly slow and inaccurate. A colour
scale was found to be better than a greyscale for all display types, but a greyscale was helpful compared to height-only. These
results suggest that point-based spatializations should be chosen over landscape representations, at least for tasks involving only
point data itself rather than derived information about the data space.
Keywords
Numerosity , 2D , Colour , Greyscale , Surface , Points , 3D , Spatialization , User study , Information Landscape
Journal title
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON VISUALIZATION AND COMPUTER GRAPHICS
Serial Year
2007
Journal title
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON VISUALIZATION AND COMPUTER GRAPHICS
Record number
402132
Link To Document