Author/Authors :
Garcia-Delgado، نويسنده , , Luis; Driscoll، نويسنده , , Michael J.; Meyer، نويسنده , , John E.; Todreas، نويسنده , , Neil E، نويسنده ,
Abstract :
Cycle length extension in currently operating PWRs may be economically interesting if the
benefits stemming from capacity factor improvement oset the higher fuel costs of the longer
cycle. A PWR reload core is presented that meets current physics and fuel performance design
limits for a cycle of 33.9 EFPM or 36 calendar months when operating at a capacity factor of
94.1%. Fuel is enriched to 6.5% U-235 and selected pins use gadolinia as burnable absorber
mixed with UO2. The power is evenly distributed over a broad region of the core by including
pins with two dierent concentrations of gadolinia in the assemblies. The core periphery is
loaded with reused assemblies. The rest of the assemblies are discharged after one cycle in the
core. The fuel performance is acceptable, although the parameters analyzed are closer to the
limits than in a contemporary reference 18-month cycle multibatch loading strategy. The 36-
month core is economically competitive with an 18-month reference core under certain
operational conditions. Potential reductions in fuel enrichment costs would make the 36-
month cycle cost competitive with the 18-month reference cycle under a wide range of condi-
tions