• Title of article

    Comparison of moist vs. air-dry biomass provision chains for energy generation from annual crops

  • Author/Authors

    Cheryl A. Heinz، نويسنده , , M. Kaltschmitt، نويسنده , , R. Stulpnagel، نويسنده , , K. Scheffer، نويسنده ,

  • Issue Information
    روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2001
  • Pages
    19
  • From page
    197
  • To page
    215
  • Abstract
    Annual crops for energy generation from agriculture are usually processed as cereal bales with air-dry biomass. As a promising alternative a novel concept of moist biomass has been developed. In this concept biomass is produced in a “double-cropping system” and processed via ensiling and mechanical dehydration. The aim of this paper is to describe the concept of moist biomass provision in comparison with air-dry biomass provision. To assess the advantages and disadvantages of the two concepts, they are compared with each other regarding environmental and economic aspects. The methodological approaches used as well as selected results are presented. Among others, the results show that the provision of moist biomass could be advantageous concerning some environmental aspects but the energy provision costs are significantly higher.
  • Keywords
    Moist biomass , Provision chains , Energy balances , Life cycle assessment (LCA) , Environmentalanalysis , Economic analysis , Silage , triticale , Annual crops
  • Journal title
    Biomass and Bioenergy
  • Serial Year
    2001
  • Journal title
    Biomass and Bioenergy
  • Record number

    407119