Abstract :
Four kinds of moving mass elements, 1st-node, 2nd-node, full and short-range mass elements, are
presented, where the 1st-node (or 2nd-node) mass element refers to that with mass distributed from
the first node (or second node) to the arbitrary position of a two-node beam element, the full mass
element is the special case of the 1st-node (or 2nd-node) mass element with mass distributed over
the full length of the beam element, while the short-range mass element is the case with its location
arbitrary on a beam element. If the total range of a distributed mass is denoted by R and the length
of each beam element is denoted by , then, for the case of R , one may model the distributed
mass on the beam using the combination of the 1st-node, 2nd-node and full mass elements, while for
the case of R< , one may model the distributed mass using the short-range mass element. It has
been found that the effects of the vertical (¯y ) and horizontal (¯x) inertia forces, Coriolis force and
centrifugal force induced by the moving distributed mass can be easily taken into the formulations
by means of the last concept. To illustrate the application of the presented theory, the dynamic analysis
of a pinned–pinned beam and that of a portal frame under the action of a moving uniformly
distributed mass are performed by means of the finite element method and the Newmark integration
method. Numerical results show that some pertinent factors, such as Coriolis force, centrifugal force,
acceleration, velocity and total range of the moving distributed mass, have significant influences on
the vertical (¯y ) and horizontal (¯x ) response of a structure
Keywords :
portal frame , moving mass element , Dynamic response , moving distributed mass , Finiteelement method