Title of article :
A Simple Reclassification Method for Correcting Uncertainty in Land Use/Land Cover Data Sets Used with Land Surface Models
Author/Authors :
Joseph G. Alfieri، نويسنده , , Dr. Dev Niyogi، نويسنده , , Margaret A. LeMone، نويسنده , , Fei Chen، نويسنده , , Souleymane Fall ، نويسنده ,
Issue Information :
ماهنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2007
Abstract :
With increasing computational resources, environmental models are run at finer grid spacing
to resolve the land surface characteristics. The land use/land cover (LULC) data sets input into land surface
models are used to assign various default parameters from a look-up tables. The objective of this study is to
assess the potential uncertainty in the LULC data and to present a reclassification method for improving the
accuracy of LULC data sets. The study focuses on the Southern Great Plains and specifically the Walnut
River Watershed in southeastern Kansas, USA. The uncertainty analysis is conducted using two data sets:
The National Land Cover Dataset 1992 (NLCD 92) and the Gap Analysis Program (GAP) data set, and a
reclassification logic tree. A comparison of these data sets showed that they do not agree for approximately
27% of the watershed. Moreover, an accuracy assessment of these two data sets indicated that neither had
an overall accuracy as high as 80%. Using the relationships between land-surface characteristics and LULC,
a reclassification of the watershed was conducted using a logical model. This model iteratively reclassified
the uncertain pixels according to their surface characteristics. The model utilized normalized difference
vegetation index (NDVI) measurements during April and July 2003, elevation, and slope. The
reclassification yielded a revised LULC dataset that was substantially improved. The overall accuracy of
the revised data set was nearly 93%. The study results suggest: (i) as models adopt finer grid spacings, the
uncertainty in the LULC data will become significant; (ii) assimilating NDVI into the land-surface models
can reduce the uncertainty due to LULC assignment; (iii) the standard LULC data sets must be used with
caution when the focus is on local scale; and (iv) reclassification is a valuable means of improving the
accuracy of LULC data sets prior to applying them to local issues or phenomena.
Keywords :
Land use , Land cover , land surface modeling , NDVI , land-surface characteristics , surfaceheterogeneity.
Journal title :
Pure and Applied Geophysics
Journal title :
Pure and Applied Geophysics