Fall arrest strategy affects peak hand impact force in a forward fall

We measured the peak hand impact force involved in bimanually arresting a forward fall to the ground from a 1-m shoulder height in five healthy young males. The effects of three different subject instruction sets: “arrest the fall naturally”; “keep the head as far from the ground as possible”; and “minimize the peak hand forces” were studied by measuring body segment kinematics, ground reaction forces, and upper-extremity myoelectric activity. The hypotheses were tested that the (a) arrest strategy did not influence peak impact force, (b) arm configuration, impact velocity and upper-extremity electromyography (EMG) levels correlate to the peak impact force (c) and impacting the ground with one hand leading the other does not increase the impact force over that obtained with simultaneous hand use. The results show that these subjects were able to volitionally decrease the peak impact force at the wrist by an average of 27% compared with a “natural landing” (p=0.014) and 40% compared with a “stiff-arm landing” (p<0.0005). The magnitude of the peak unilateral wrist force varied from 0.65 to 1.7 body weight for these moderate falls onto a padded surface. Peak force correlated with the elbow angle at impact, wrist velocity at impact and with pre-EMG triceps activity. The force was not significantly higher for non-simultaneous hand impacts. We conclude that fall arrest strategy can substantially alter the peak impact forces applied to the distal forearm during a fall arrest. Therefore, the fall arrest strategy likely influences wrist injury risk independent of bone strength.