Author/Authors :
S. Ciatto، نويسنده , , N. Houssami، نويسنده , , A. Apruzzese، نويسنده , , E. Bassetti، نويسنده , , B. Brancato، نويسنده , , F. Carozzi، نويسنده , , S. Catarzi، نويسنده , , M.P. Lamberini، نويسنده , , G. Marcelli، نويسنده , , R. Pellizzoni، نويسنده , , B. Pesce، نويسنده , , G. Risso، نويسنده , , F. Russo، نويسنده , , A. Scorsolini، نويسنده ,
Abstract :
The inter- and intraobserver agreement (κ-statistic) in reporting according to Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS®) breast density categories was tested in 12 dedicated breast radiologists reading a digitized set of 100 two-view mammograms. Average intraobserver agreement was substantial (κ=0.71, range 0.32–0.88) on a four-grade scale (D1/D2/D3/D4) and almost perfect (κ=0.81, range 0.62–1.00) on a two-grade scale (D1–2/D3–4). Average interobserver agreement was moderate (κ=0.54, range 0.02–0.77) on a four-grade scale and substantial (κ=0.71, range 0.31–0.88) on a two-grade scale. Major disagreement was found for intermediate categories (D2=0.25, D3=0.28). Categorization of breast density according to BI-RADS is feasible and consistency is good within readers and reasonable between readers. Interobserver inconsistency does occur, and checking the adoption of proper criteria through a proficiency test and appropriate training might be useful. As inconsistency is probably due to erroneous perception of classification criteria, standard sets of reference images should be made available for training.