Title of article
Validation of the TOSCA to measure shame and guilt
Author/Authors
Sandra L. Woien، نويسنده , , Heidi A. H. Ernst، نويسنده , , Julie A. Patock-Peckham، نويسنده , , Craig T. Nagoshi، نويسنده ,
Issue Information
روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2003
Pages
14
From page
313
To page
326
Abstract
A college student sample (190 females, 148 males) was administered the Test of Self-Conscious Affect (TOSCA), which yields scales for shame and guilt. Subjects were also measured on perceived parenting, personality dimensions, religiosity, and psychological adjustment. There was some evidence that parental overprotection was associated with shame in males and guilt in females, while religiosity was largely not predictive of shame or guilt. Personality measures indicative of external locus of control and poor self-regulation were significantly correlated with shame for both males and females, with smaller effects in the opposite direction for guilt. For both genders, shame was highly predictive of poorer psychological adjustment, as measured by self-esteem, perceived stress, and psychiatric symptomatology, while guilt was uncorrelated with adjustment. These results support the validity of the TOSCA and suggest that shame is a significant risk factor for poor psychological adjustment.
Keywords
Religiosity , Psychological adjustment , shame , Parenting style , Guilt , Personality
Journal title
Personality and Individual Differences
Serial Year
2003
Journal title
Personality and Individual Differences
Record number
457171
Link To Document