Title of article :
Goldberg’s ‘IPIP’ Big-Five factor markers: Internal consistency and concurrent validation in Scotland
Author/Authors :
Alan J. Gow، نويسنده , , Martha C. Whiteman، نويسنده , , Alison Pattie، نويسنده , , Ian J. Deary، نويسنده ,
Issue Information :
روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2005
Abstract :
Goldberg’s (2001) IPIP Big-Five personality factor markers currently lack validating evidence. The structure of the 50-item IPIP was examined in three different adult samples (total N = 906), in each case justifying a 5-factor solution, with only minor discrepancies. Age differences were comparable to previous findings using other inventories. One sample (N = 207) also completed two further personality measures (the NEO-FFI and the EPQ-R Short Form). Conscientiousness, Extraversion and Emotional Stability/Neuroticism scales of the IPIP were highly correlated with those of the NEO-FFI (r = 0.69 to −0.83, p < 0.01). Agreeableness and Intellect/Openness scales correlated less strongly (r = 0.49 and 0.59 respectively, p < 0.01). Correlations between IPIP and EPQ-R Extraversion and Emotional Stability/Neuroticism were high, at 0.85 and −0.84 respectively. The IPIP scales have good internal consistency and relate strongly to major dimensions of personality assessed by two leading questionnaires.
Keywords :
personality , IPIP Big-Five factor markers , validation
Journal title :
Personality and Individual Differences
Journal title :
Personality and Individual Differences