Title of article
Evaluation of the effect of oral verapamil on clinical outcome and angiographic restenosis after percutaneous coronary intervention: The randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter verapamil slow-release for prevention of cardiovascular even
Author/Authors
Hans-Peter Bestehorn، نويسنده , , Franz-Josef Neumann، نويسنده , , Heinz Joachim Büttner، نويسنده , , Peter Betz، نويسنده , , Peter Stürzenhofecker، نويسنده , , Eberhard von Hodenberg، نويسنده , , Antoine Verdun، نويسنده , , Laszlo Levai، نويسنده , , Jean Pierre Monassier، نويسنده , , Helmut Roskamm، نويسنده ,
Issue Information
روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2004
Pages
6
From page
2160
To page
2165
Abstract
Objectives
We investigated the effect of oral verapamil on clinical outcome and angiographic restenosis after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).
Background
Thus far, there is no established systemic pharmacologic approach for the prevention of restenosis after PCIs. Five small studies reported encouraging results for calcium channel blockers.
Methods
Our randomized double-blind trial included 700 consecutive patients with successful PCI of a native coronary artery. Patients received the calcium channel blocker verapamil, 240 mg twice daily for six months, or placebo. Primary clinical end point was the composite rate of death, myocardial infarction, and target vessel revascularization (TVR) during one-year follow-up; the angiographic end point was late lumen loss at the six-month follow-up angiography.
Results
We obtained complete clinical follow-up in 95% of the patients, and scheduled angiography was performed in 94%. The proportion of patients treated with stents was 83%. The primary clinical end point was reached in 67 (19.3%) patients on verapamil and in 103 (29.3%) patients on placebo (relative risk [RR] 0.66 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.48 to 0.89]; p = 0.002). This difference between the groups was driven by TVR (17.5% with verapamil vs. 26.2% with placebo; RR 0.67 [95% CI 0.49 to 0.93]; p = 0.006). Late lumen loss was 0.74 ± 0.70 mm with verapamil and 0.81 ± 0.75 mm with placebo (p = 0.11). Compared with placebo, verapamil reduced the rate of restenosis ≥75% (7.8% vs. 13.7%; RR 0.57 [95% CI 0.35 to 0.92]; p = 0.014).
Conclusions
Verapamil compared with placebo improves long-term clinical outcome after PCI of native coronary arteries by reducing the need for TVR. This was caused by a reduction in the rate of high-grade restenosis.
Keywords
myocardial infarction , relative risk , CAD , PCI , coronary artery disease , Confidence interval , CABG , MI , PTCA , Percutaneous coronary intervention , CI , MLD , percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty , TVR , target vessel revascularization , RR , coronary artery bypass grafting , minimal lumen diameter , VESPA , Verapamil Slow-Release for Prevention of Cardiovascular Events After Angioplasty trial
Journal title
JACC (Journal of the American College of Cardiology)
Serial Year
2004
Journal title
JACC (Journal of the American College of Cardiology)
Record number
459163
Link To Document