Title of article :
Differences in Mechanisms and Outcomes of Syncope in Patients With Coronary Disease or Idiopathic Left Ventricular Dysfunction as Assessed by Electrophysiologic Testing Original Research Article
Author/Authors :
Béatrice Brembilla-Perrot، نويسنده , , Christine Suty-Selton، نويسنده , , Daniel Beurrier، نويسنده , , Pierre Houriez، نويسنده , , Marc Nippert، نويسنده , , Arnaud Terrier de la Chaise، نويسنده , , Pierre Louis، نويسنده , , Olivier Claudon، نويسنده , , Marius Andronache، نويسنده , , Ahmed Abdelaah، نويسنده , , Nicolas Sadoul، نويسنده , , Yves Juillière، نويسنده ,
Issue Information :
روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2004
Abstract :
Objectives
This study evaluated the causes of syncope and the significance and differences in left ventricular (LV) dysfunction, coronary disease, and idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM).
Background
Risk stratification of and indications for an automated defibrillator could differ according to the cause of LV dysfunction.
Methods
Electrophysiologic study, including atrial and ventricular programmed stimulation, was performed in 119 patients with coronary disease (group I) and 61 patients with DCM (group II) with an left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) <40% and syncope. Patients were followed from one to six years (mean 4 ± 2 years).
Results
Sustained monomorphic ventricular tachycardia (VT) was induced in 44 group I patients (37%) and 13 group II patients (21%); ventricular flutter (>270 beats/min) or ventricular fibrillation (VF) was induced in 24 group I patients (19%) and 9 group II patients (15%); and various other arrhythmias were identified. Syncope remained unexplained in 34 group I patients (30%) and 16 group II patients (27%). Prognosis depended on the heart disease: VT or VF induction was a predictive factor of mortality in coronary disease and identified a group with high cardiac mortality (46%), compared with patients with a negative study, who had a lower mortality (6%; p < 0.001) than in other studies. Cardiac mortality was only correlated with LVEF in DCM.
Conclusions
Various causes could explain syncope in 70% of patients with coronary disease and DCM, but differences were noted: VT was frequent in coronary disease with a bad prognosis, and ischemia could explain syncope; in DCM, different causes such as atrial tachycardia could be responsible for syncope, but the prognosis only depended on LVEF.
Keywords :
myocardial infarction , blood pressure , EPS , heart failure , Left ventricular , Dilated cardiomyopathy , MI , Ventricular tachycardia , ICD , Vf , Hf , LV , LVEF , left ventricular ejection fraction , ventricular fibrillation , VT , atrioventricular , BP , DCM , AV , implantable cardioverter-defibrillator , electrophysiologic study , SVTA , supraventricular tachyarrhythmia
Journal title :
JACC (Journal of the American College of Cardiology)
Journal title :
JACC (Journal of the American College of Cardiology)