Title of article :
Cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in hypertensive patients with a history of atrial fibrillation: The Losartan Intervention For End point reduction in hypertension (LIFE) study Original Research Article
Author/Authors :
Kristian Wachtell، نويسنده , , Bj?rn Hornestam، نويسنده , , Mika Lehto، نويسنده , , David J. Slotwiner، نويسنده , , Eva Gerdts، نويسنده , , Michael H. Olsen، نويسنده , , Peter Aurup، نويسنده , , Bj?rn Dahl?f، نويسنده , , Hans Ibsen، نويسنده , , Stevo Julius، نويسنده , , Sverre E. Kjeldsen، نويسنده , , Lars H. Lindholm، نويسنده , , Markku S. Nieminen، نويسنده , , Jens Rokkedal، نويسنده , , Richard B. Devereux، نويسنده ,
Issue Information :
روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2005
Pages :
7
From page :
705
To page :
711
Abstract :
Objectives We assessed the impact of antihypertensive treatment in hypertensive patients with electrocardiographic (ECG) left ventricular (LV) hypertrophy and a history of atrial fibrillation (AF). Background Optimal treatment of hypertensive patients with AF to reduce the risk of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality remains unclear. Methods As part of the Losartan Intervention For End point reduction in hypertension (LIFE) study, 342 hypertensive patients with AF and LV hypertrophy were assigned to losartan- or atenolol-based therapy for 1,471 patient-years of follow-up. Results The primary composite end point (cardiovascular mortality, stroke, and myocardial infarction) occurred in 36 patients in the losartan group versus 67 in the atenolol group (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.58, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.39 to 0.88, p = 0.009). Cardiovascular deaths occurred in 20 versus 38 patients in the losartan and atenolol groups, respectively (HR = 0.58, 95% CI 0.33 to 0.99, p = 0.048). Stroke occurred in 18 versus 38 patients (HR = 0.55, 95% CI 0.31 to 0.97, p = 0.039), and myocardial infarction in 11 versus 8 patients (p = NS). Losartan-based treatment led to trends toward lower all-cause mortality (30 vs. 49, HR = 0.67, 95% CI 0.42 to 1.06, p = 0.090) and fewer pacemaker implantations (5 vs. 15, p = 0.065), whereas hospitalization for heart failure took place in 15 versus 26 patients and sudden cardiac death in 9 versus 17, respectively (both p = NS). The benefit of losartan was greater in patients with AF than those with sinus rhythm for the primary composite end point (p = 0.019) and cardiovascular mortality (p = 0.039). Conclusions Losartan is more effective than atenolol-based therapy in reducing the risk of the primary composite end point of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality as well as stroke and cardiovascular death in hypertensive patients with ECG LV hypertrophy and AF.
Keywords :
myocardial infarction , Atrial fibrillation , heart failure , Left ventricular , Life , Confidence interval , Hazard ratio , MI , ECG , CI , Hf , LV , HR , AF , electrocardiographic , Losartan Intervention For End point reduction in hypertension study
Journal title :
JACC (Journal of the American College of Cardiology)
Serial Year :
2005
Journal title :
JACC (Journal of the American College of Cardiology)
Record number :
459769
Link To Document :
بازگشت