Title of article :
Triple Versus Dual Antiplatelet Therapy After Coronary Stenting: Impact on Stent Thrombosis Original Research Article
Author/Authors :
Seung-Whan Lee، نويسنده , , Seong-Wook Park، نويسنده , , Myeong-Ki Hong، نويسنده , , Young-Hak Kim، نويسنده , , Bong-Ki Lee، نويسنده , , Jong-Min Song، نويسنده , , Ki-Hoon Han، نويسنده , , Cheol Whan Lee، نويسنده , , Duk-Hyun Kang، نويسنده , , Jae-Kwan Song، نويسنده , , Jae-Joong Kim، نويسنده , , Seung-Jung Park، نويسنده ,
Issue Information :
روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2005
Pages :
5
From page :
1833
To page :
1837
Abstract :
Objectives We evaluated safety and efficacy of triple antiplatelet therapy with aspirin, clopidogrel, or ticlopidine and cilostazol after coronary stenting. Background Triple antiplatelet therapy might have beneficial effect to prevent thrombotic complications in patients undergoing coronary stenting. Methods Patients undergoing successful coronary stenting were divided into dual antiplatelet therapy (aspirin plus clopidogrel or ticlopidine, group I, n = 1,597) and triple antiplatelet therapy (aspirin plus clopidogrel or ticlopidine plus cilostazol, group II, n = 1,415) groups. The primary end point included death, myocardial infarction, target lesion revascularization, or stent thrombosis within 30 days. The secondary end point was side effects of study drugs, including major bleeding, vascular complication, hepatic dysfunction, and hematological complications. Results Multi-vessel stenting and the use of long stents were more prevalent in group II than in group I. The primary end point was 0.8% in group I and 0.3% in group II (p = 0.085). Stent thrombosis within 30 days was significantly lower in group II (n = 1, 0.1%) than in group I (n = 9, 0.5%; p = 0.024). The independent predictors of stent thrombosis were primary stenting (odds ratio [OR] 7.9, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.0 to 30.8, p = 0.003) and triple therapy (OR 0.12, 95% CI 0.015 to 0.98, p = 0.048). The overall adverse drug effects, including major bleeding, neutropenia, and thrombocytopenia, were no different between two groups (1.8% vs. 2.6%, p = 0.104). Conclusions Compared with the dual antiplatelet regimen, triple antiplatelet therapy seemed to be more effective in preventing thrombotic complications after stenting without an increased risk of side effects. Triple antiplatelet therapy might be safely applied in patients or lesions with a high risk of stent thrombosis.
Keywords :
odds ratio , Acute myocardial infarction , Confidence interval , mace , OR , AMI , CI , ADP , adenosine diphosphate , major adverse cardiac event
Journal title :
JACC (Journal of the American College of Cardiology)
Serial Year :
2005
Journal title :
JACC (Journal of the American College of Cardiology)
Record number :
460338
Link To Document :
بازگشت