Title of article :
Randomized Comparison of Upstream Tirofiban Versus Downstream High Bolus Dose Tirofiban or Abciximab on Tissue-Level Perfusion and Troponin Release in High-Risk Acute Coronary Syndromes Treated With Percutaneous Coronary Interventions: The EVEREST Trial
Author/Authors :
Leonardo Bolognese، نويسنده , , Giovanni Falsini، نويسنده , , Francesco Liistro، نويسنده , , Paolo Angioli، نويسنده , , Kenneth Ducci، نويسنده , , Tamara Taddei، نويسنده , , Roberto Tarducci، نويسنده , , Franco Cosmi، نويسنده , , Silvia Baldassarre، نويسنده , , Antonio Burali، نويسنده ,
Issue Information :
روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2006
Abstract :
Objectives
We aimed to compare the effects of upstream tirofiban versus downstream high-dose bolus (HDB) tirofiban and abciximab on tissue level perfusion and troponin I release in high-risk non–ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients treated with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).
Background
Optimal timing and dosage of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors for ACS remain to be explored.
Methods
We randomized 93 high-risk ACS patients undergoing PCI to receive upstream (in the coronary care unit) tirofiban, downstream (just prior to PCI) HDB tirofiban, and downstream abciximab. We evaluated the effects of the three drug regimens on tissue-level perfusion using the corrected Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) frame count, the TIMI myocardial perfusion grade (TMPG), and intracoronary myocardial contrast echocardiography (MCE) before and immediately after PCI and after cardiac troponin I (cTnI).
Results
The TMPG 0/1 perfusion was significantly less frequent with upstream tirofiban compared with HDB tirofiban and abciximab both before (28.1% vs. 66.7% vs. 71%, respectively; p = 0.0009) and after PCI (6.2% vs. 20% vs. 35.5%, respectively; p = 0.015). Upstream tirofiban was also associated with a significantly higher MCE score index (0.88 ± 0.18 vs. 0.77 ± 0.32 vs. 0.71 ± 0.30, respectively; p < 0.05). Post-procedural cTnI elevation was significantly less frequent among patients in the upstream tirofiban group compared with the HDB tirofiban and abciximab groups (9.4% vs. 30% vs. 38.7%, respectively; p = 0.018). The cTnI levels after PCI were significantly lower with upstream tirofiban compared with HDB tirofiban (3.8 ± 4.1 vs. 7.2 ± 12; p = 0.015) and abciximab (3.8 ± 4.1 vs. 9 ± 13.8; p = 0.0002)
Conclusions
Among high-risk non–ST-segment-elevation ACS patients treated with an early invasive strategy, upstream tirofiban is associated with improved tissue-level perfusion and attenuated myocardial damage.
Keywords :
CAD , PCI , coronary artery disease , Glycoprotein , MCE , Percutaneous coronary intervention , Acute coronary syndrome , GP , CCU , ACS , TIMI , Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction , myocardial contrast echocardiography , cTfc , corrected TIMI frame count , TMPG , coronary care unit , cTnI , cardiac troponin I , TIMI myocardial perfusion grade , HDB , high-dose bolus , NSTE-ACS , non–ST-segment-elevation acute coronary syndrome , TACTICS-TIMI 18 , Treat Angina with Aggrastat and Determine Cost of Therapy with an Invasive or Conservative Strategy-Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction 18
Journal title :
JACC (Journal of the American College of Cardiology)
Journal title :
JACC (Journal of the American College of Cardiology)