Title of article :
Oral Rapamycin After Coronary Bare-Metal Stent Implantation to Prevent Restenosis: The Prospective, Randomized Oral Rapamycin in Argentina (ORAR II) Study Original Research Article
Author/Authors :
Alfredo E. Rodriguez، نويسنده , , Juan F. Granada، نويسنده , , Maximo Rodriguez-Alemparte، نويسنده , , Cesar F. Vigo، نويسنده , , Juan Delgado، نويسنده , , Carlos Fernandez-Pereira، نويسنده , , Antonio Pocovi، نويسنده , , Alfredo M. Rodriguez-Granillo، نويسنده , , Daryl Schulz، نويسنده , , Albert E. Raizner، نويسنده , , Igor Palacios، نويسنده , , William O’Neill، نويسنده , , Grzegorz L. Kaluza، نويسنده , , Gregg Stone and ORAR II Investigators، نويسنده ,
Issue Information :
روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2006
Abstract :
Objectives
The purpose of this study was to assess the role of oral rapamycin in decreased restenosis after bare metal stent implantation.
Background
Small observational studies suggest that the administration of oral rapamycin reduces angiographic restenosis after bare metal stent implantation.
Methods
Between September 2003 and September 2004, 100 patients were randomized to either oral rapamycin (6-mg loading dose given 2.7 h before intervention followed by 3 mg/day for 14 days) plus diltiazem 180 mg/day or no therapy after the implantation of a coronary bare metal stent design. The primary study end point was incidence of angiographic binary restenosis and late loss at nine months. The secondary end points were target lesion revascularization, target vessel revascularization, and incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events at 1 year.
Results
Angiographic follow-up was completed in 87% of patients. In the rapamycin group, the drug was well tolerated (26% minor side effects) and was maintained in 96% of patients. At 9 months, the in-segment binary restenosis was reduced by 72% (11.6% rapamycin vs. 42.8% no-therapy group, p = 0.001) and the in-stent binary restenosis was reduced by 65% (12% rapamycin vs. 34.6% no-therapy group, p = 0.009). The in-segment late loss was also significantly reduced with oral therapy (0.66 vs. 1.13 mm, respectively; 43% reduction, p < 0.001). At 1 year, patients in the oral rapamycin group also showed a significantly lower incidence of target vessel revascularization (8.3% vs. 38%, respectively, p < 0.001), target lesion revascularization (7.6% vs. 37.2%, respectively, p < 0.001), and major adverse cardiovascular events (20% vs. 44%, respectively, p = 0.018).
Conclusions
This randomized, controlled, and unblinded study showed that the administration of oral rapamycin during 14 days after stent implantation significantly reduces angiographic and clinical parameters of restenosis.
Keywords :
PCI , TLR , Mace , Percutaneous coronary intervention , TVR , target vessel revascularization , target lesion revascularization , major adverse cardiovascular event
Journal title :
JACC (Journal of the American College of Cardiology)
Journal title :
JACC (Journal of the American College of Cardiology)