Title of article :
Improved Detection of Coronary Artery Disease by Stress Perfusion Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance With the Use of Delayed Enhancement Infarction Imaging Original Research Article
Author/Authors :
Igor Klem، نويسنده , , John F. Heitner، نويسنده , , Dipan J. Shah، نويسنده , , Michael H. Sketch Jr، نويسنده , , Victor Behar، نويسنده , , Jonathan Weinsaft، نويسنده , , Peter Cawley، نويسنده , , Michele Parker، نويسنده , , Michael Elliott، نويسنده , , Robert M. Judd، نويسنده , , Raymond J. Kim، نويسنده ,
Issue Information :
روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2006
Pages :
9
From page :
1630
To page :
1638
Abstract :
Objectives We tested a pre-defined visual interpretation algorithm that combines cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) data from perfusion and infarction imaging for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease (CAD). Background Cardiovascular magnetic resonance can assess both myocardial perfusion and infarction with independent techniques in a single session. Methods We prospectively enrolled 100 consecutive patients with suspected CAD scheduled for X-ray coronary angiography. Patients had comprehensive clinical evaluation, including Rose angina questionnaire, 12-lead electrocardiography, C-reactive protein, and calculation of Framingham risk. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance included cine, adenosine-stress and rest perfusion-CMR, and delayed enhancement-CMR (DE-CMR) for infarction imaging. Matched stress-rest perfusion defects in the absence of infarction by DE-CMR were considered artifactual. All patients underwent X-ray angiography within 24 h of CMR. Results Ninety-two patients had complete CMR examinations. Significant CAD (≥70% stenosis) was found in 37 patients (40%). The combination of perfusion and DE-CMR had a sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of 89%, 87%, and 88%, respectively, for CAD diagnosis, compared with 84%, 58%, and 68%, respectively, for perfusion-CMR alone. The combination had higher specificity and accuracy (p < 0.0001), owing to incorporating the exceptionally high specificity (98%) of DE-CMR. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis demonstrated the combination provided better performance than cine, perfusion, or DE-CMR alone. The accuracy was high in single-vessel and multivessel disease and independent of CAD location. Multivariable analysis including standard clinical parameters demonstrated the combination was the strongest independent CAD predictor. Conclusions A combined perfusion and infarction CMR examination with a visual interpretation algorithm can accurately diagnose CAD in the clinical setting. The combination is superior to perfusion-CMR alone.
Keywords :
myocardial infarction , RCA , SPECT , Receiver operating characteristic , coronary artery disease , ROC , LAD , Single-photon emission computed tomography , MI , CAD , CMR , Right coronary artery , LV , left ventricle/ventricular , left anterior descending coronary artery , LCx , left circumflex coronary artery , HSCRP , high-sensitivity C-reactive protein , cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging , DE-CMR , delayed enhancement-cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging
Journal title :
JACC (Journal of the American College of Cardiology)
Serial Year :
2006
Journal title :
JACC (Journal of the American College of Cardiology)
Record number :
460723
Link To Document :
بازگشت