• Title of article

    Counselling women about choice

  • Author/Authors

    L. H. Harris، نويسنده ,

  • Issue Information
    روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2001
  • Pages
    15
  • From page
    93
  • To page
    107
  • Abstract
    Patient choice—informed consent and informed refusal—is an important ethical and legal principle in medicine. In pregnancy this issue is not straightforward: should a pregnant womanʹs autonomous choice be respected when she may cause fetal harm by declining recommended caesarean section? Should a pregnant women be free to choose elective caesarean section as an alternative to labour and vaginal delivery? This chapter reviews cases of court-ordered caesarean, and the ethical and legal paradigms for informed refusal in pregnancy. In general, clinicians should not seek court authority to support medical recommendations. This chapter also reviews arguments for and against offering women elective caesarean without strict medical indication. Although compelling arguments in favour of caesarean on demand can be made, clear evidence showing adequate safety and advantages of elective caesarean over vaginal delivery does not yet exist. Ethics, law, politics and history all inform the issue of choice with respect to caesarean in important ways.
  • Keywords
    medical , pregnancy , Ethics , fetus , Caesarean section , surgical procedures , Choice behaviour , patient advocacy , patientcompliance , elective.
  • Journal title
    Best Paractice and Research Clinical Obstetrics and Gynaecology
  • Serial Year
    2001
  • Journal title
    Best Paractice and Research Clinical Obstetrics and Gynaecology
  • Record number

    465266