Title of article
Managing women with post-menopausal bleeding
Author/Authors
Elisabeth Epstein، نويسنده , , Lil Valentin، نويسنده ,
Issue Information
روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2004
Pages
19
From page
125
To page
143
Abstract
Transvaginal ultrasound examination can reliably distinguish women with post-menopausal bleeding (PMB) who are at low risk of endometrial pathology (endometrial thickness ≤4 mm) from those who are at high risk (endometrium ≥5 mm) and can rule out focally growing lesions in the uterine cavity using saline infusion into the cavity as a negative contrast agent (hydrosonography). The 5 mm cut-off is applicable irrespective of the use of hormone replacement therapy. It is justified to refrain from endometrial sampling in women with PMB and an endometrial thickness of ≤4 mm because the risk of endometrial cancer in these women is low (0.1–1.0%). However, it is not known whether these women need follow-up. About 80% of women with PMB and an endometrium of ≥5 mm have focally growing pathological lesions in the uterine cavity. These should be removed by operative hysteroscopy because dilatation and curettage (D and C) will fail to diagnose and remove a large proportion of these lesions. However, D and C is a reliable diagnostic method for women without focal lesions in the uterine cavity. It is not known whether simple outpatient sampling devices (e.g. Pipelle®) are as reliable as D and C in women without focal lesions. A measurement of endometrial thickness is a simple and accurate method for estimating the risk of endometrial cancer. The reliability of ultrasound evaluation of endometrial morphology and/or vascularization for risk estimation of endometrial malignancy remains to be determined.
Keywords
ultrasonography , reproducibility , hysteroscopy , Endometrium , endometrial biopsy , Malignancy , Endometrial polyp , Endometrial Cancer , endometrial pathology , postmenopausalbleeding , curettage , saline contrast sonohysterography , hydrosonography , power Doppler , observer variation , three-dimensional ultrasonography.
Journal title
Best Paractice and Research Clinical Obstetrics and Gynaecology
Serial Year
2004
Journal title
Best Paractice and Research Clinical Obstetrics and Gynaecology
Record number
465456
Link To Document