Title of article :
In vitro optimisation of topical negative pressure regimens for angiogenesis into synthetic dermal replacements
Author/Authors :
Matthew J. Potter، نويسنده , , Paul Banwell، نويسنده , , Christopher Baldwin، نويسنده , , Elizabeth Clayton، نويسنده , , Laurie Irvine، نويسنده , , Claire Linge، نويسنده , , Addrian O. Grobbelaar، نويسنده , , Roy Sanders، نويسنده , , Julian F. Dye، نويسنده ,
Issue Information :
روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2008
Abstract :
Background
The use of synthetic dermal replacements (SDRs) in the treatment of large wounds, which have associated morbidity and mortality, has attracted great interest. However, because of poor outcome, SDRs have limited use. The addition of topical negative pressure (TNP) has increased their success, but little research has focused on the underlying mechanisms. This paper studies the in vitro effects of TNP on commonly used SDRs to identify the most effective TNP regimen and optimum SDR for encouraging endothelial cell ingress.
Methods
Endothelial cells were co-cultured in vitro on four SDRs with or without TNP. Negative pressure (125 mmHg) was applied intermittently, continuously, for 4 h per day, or not at all. Endothelial ingress was measured for each condition.
Results
In the collagen controls, cell migration was minimal. Integra™ gave the greatest endothelial cell migration (p < 0.05, n = 3). TNP increased endothelial cell migration, intermittent application being the optimum regimen.
Conclusions
Integra™ has an open sponge structure which may account for greater angiogenicity than Alloderm™, Permacol™ and Xenoderm™. In vitro intermittent TNP stimulates the greatest angiogenic response. The majority of clinical studies investigating SDR success with TNP have used continuous regimens; this study suggests a change in clinical practice to intermittent application.
Keywords :
Topical negative pressureAngiogenesisSynthetic dermal replacements