Title of article :
Drug-Eluting Stents in the Treatment of Intermediate Lesions: Pooled Analysis From Four Randomized Trials Original Research Article
Author/Authors :
Jeffrey W. Moses، نويسنده , , Gregg W. Stone، نويسنده , , Eugenia Nikolsky، نويسنده , , Gary S. Mintz، نويسنده , , George Dangas*، نويسنده , , Eberhard Grube، نويسنده , , Stephen G. Ellis، نويسنده , , Alexandra J. Lansky، نويسنده , , Giora Weisz، نويسنده , , Martin Fahy، نويسنده , , Yingbo Na، نويسنده , , Mary E. Russell، نويسنده , , Dennis Donohoe، نويسنده , , Martin B. Leon، نويسنده , , Roxana Mehran، نويسنده ,
Issue Information :
روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2006
Pages :
8
From page :
2164
To page :
2171
Abstract :
Objectives To address the safety and efficacy of drug-eluting stents (DES) in the treatment of intermediate lesions, we performed a pooled analysis of four randomized DES versus bare-metal stent (BMS) trials and assessed outcomes among patients with intermediate lesions. Background Before the introduction of DES, intermediate coronary lesions were commonly managed based on physiologic or anatomic assessment of lesion severity. The DES may challenge this paradigm. Methods The study population involved 167 of 2,478 randomized patients (6.7%) with intermediate lesions (diameter stenosis <50% [mean 44%] by quantitative coronary angiography) from the Sirolimus-coated Bx Velocity Balloon Expandable Stent in the Treatment of Patients with De Novo Coronary Artery Lesions (SIRIUS), TAXUS-IV, and the First and Second First Use to Underscore Restenosis Reduction with Everolimus (FUTURE-I and -II) trials. End points examined included early (in-hospital and 30-day) and late (1-year) major adverse cardiac events (MACE), including cardiac death, myocardial infarction (MI), target vessel revascularization (TVR), stent thrombosis, and follow-up angiographic restenosis. Results Patients with intermediate lesions randomized to DES versus BMS had low rates of 30-day MACE (1.1% vs. 4.0% respectively; p = 0.22). At one-year follow-up, patients treated with DES versus BMS had similar rates of cardiac death (0% vs. 2.7%, respectively; p = 0.11) and MI (3.4% vs. 5.4%; p = 0.49) but markedly lower rates of TVR (3.4% vs. 20.3%; p = 0.0004), MACE (5.6% vs. 25.4%; p = 0.0003), and binary angiographic restenosis (1.8% vs. 34.0%; p < 0.0001). No patient in either group developed stent thrombosis. Conclusions Compared with BMS, treatment of intermediate lesions with DES appears safe and results in a marked reduction in clinical and angiographic restenosis. The efficacy of DES may require a reevaluation of current treatment paradigms for intermediate lesions.
Keywords :
BMS , myocardial infarction , PCI , DES , TLR , mace , MI , IVUS , Percutaneous coronary intervention , Drug-eluting stent , intravascular ultrasound , TVR , target vessel revascularization , QCA , quantitative coronary angiography , FFR , major adverse cardiac events , target lesion revascularization , fractional flow reserve , bare-metal stent
Journal title :
JACC (Journal of the American College of Cardiology)
Serial Year :
2006
Journal title :
JACC (Journal of the American College of Cardiology)
Record number :
471775
Link To Document :
بازگشت