Title of article :
A Randomized Trial to Evaluate the Relative Protection Against Post-Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Microvascular Dysfunction, Ischemia, and Inflammation Among Antiplatelet and Antithrombotic Agents: The PROTECT–TIMI-30 Trial Original Research Article
Author/Authors :
C. Michael Gibson، نويسنده , , David A. Morrow، نويسنده , , Sabina A. Murphy، نويسنده , , Theresa M. Palabrica، نويسنده , , Lisa K. Jennings، نويسنده , , Peter H. Stone، نويسنده , , Henry H. Lui، نويسنده , , Thomas Bulle، نويسنده , , Nasser Lakkis، نويسنده , , Richard Kovach، نويسنده , , David J. Cohen، نويسنده , , Polly Fish، نويسنده , , Carolyn H. McCabe*، نويسنده , , Eugene Braunwald and TIMI Study Group، نويسنده ,
Issue Information :
روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2006
Abstract :
Objectives
The goal of this study was to evaluate glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibition with eptifibatide when administered with indirect thrombin inhibition as compared with monotherapy with direct thrombin inhibition with bivalirudin among patients with non–ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes (ACS).
Background
The optimal combination of antiplatelet and antithrombin regimens that maximizes efficacy and minimizes bleeding among patients with non–ST-segment elevation ACS undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is unclear.
Methods
A total of 857 patients with non–ST-segment elevation ACS were assigned randomly to eptifibatide + reduced dose unfractionated heparin (n = 298), eptifibatide + reduced-dose enoxaparin (n = 275), or bivalirudin monotherapy (n = 284).
Results
Among angiographically evaluable patients (n = 754), the primary end point of post-PCI coronary flow reserve was significantly greater with bivalirudin (1.43 vs. 1.33 for pooled eptifibatide arms, p = 0.036). Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) myocardial perfusion grade more often was normal with eptifibatide treatment compared with bivalirudin (57.9% vs. 50.9%, p = 0.048). The duration of ischemia on continuous Holter monitoring after PCI was significantly longer among patients treated with bivalirudin (169 vs. 36 min, p = 0.013). There was no excess of TIMI major bleeding among patients treated with eptifibatide compared with bivalirudin (0.7%, n = 4 vs. 0%, p = NS), but TIMI minor bleeding was increased (2.5% vs. 0.4%, p = 0.027) as was transfusion (4.4% to 0.4%, p < 0.001).
Conclusions
Among moderate- to high-risk patients with ACS undergoing PCI, coronary flow reserve was greater with bivalirudin than eptifibatide. Eptifibatide improved myocardial perfusion and reduced the duration of post-PCI ischemia but was associated with higher minor bleeding and transfusion rates. Ischemic events and biomarkers for myonecrosis, inflammation, and thrombin generation did not differ between agents.
Keywords :
ACT , myocardial infarction , Interleukin , PCI , CK-MB , intravenous , Glycoprotein , MI , Percutaneous coronary intervention , GP , IV , TIMI , Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction , NSTEMI , activated clotting time , IL , cTfc , corrected TIMI frame count , TMPG , UFH , unfractionated heparin , creatine kinase-myocardial band , TIMI myocardial perfusion grade , non–ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction
Journal title :
JACC (Journal of the American College of Cardiology)
Journal title :
JACC (Journal of the American College of Cardiology)