Title of article
The Prognostic Importance of Nonsignificant Left Main Coronary Artery Disease in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Original Research Article
Author/Authors
Gabor Gyenes، نويسنده , , Fiona M. Shrive، نويسنده , , Michelle M. Graham، نويسنده , , William A. Ghali، نويسنده , , Merrill L. Knudtson and APPROACH Investigators، نويسنده ,
Issue Information
روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2006
Pages
5
From page
276
To page
280
Abstract
Objectives
The purpose of this research was to study the association between nonsignificant (<50%) left main coronary artery disease (LMCAD) and short- and long-term survival in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).
Background
The prognostic importance of nonsignificant LMCAD is unknown; however, the co-existence of nonsignificant LMCAD may influence revascularization decisions.
Methods
We analyzed mortality and repeat catheterization rates of 11,855 patients in a prospective cardiac registry database who underwent single-vessel or multivessel PCI from January 1996 through December 2001. Of this cohort, 11.7% (n = 1,385) had nonsignificant (<50%) LMCAD. Outcomes were compared with those without LMCAD. A secondary analysis was performed on a larger cohort of 34,586 patients undergoing cardiac catheterization, irrespective of mode of revascularization therapy.
Results
Patients with nonsignificant LMCAD had more co-morbidities, and a significantly higher crude mortality rate at 1 year compared with those without LMCAD (4.4% vs. 3.4%; p = 0.05). The 7-year crude mortality hazard ratio (HR) of PCI patients with <50% LMCAD versus those with no LMCAD was 1.18 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.94 to 1.46). After risk adjustment for differences in baseline clinical profile, however, the HR decreased to 0.98 (95% CI 0.79 to 1.23). Repeat catheterization rates at 1 year did not differ between groups. The secondary analysis in all patients with nonsignificant LMCAD showed an adjusted HR of 1.03 (95% CI 0.94 to 1.14).
Conclusions
Patients undergoing single-vessel or multivessel PCI who have <50% LMCAD have a nonsignificantly increased 18% relative risk for mortality compared with those without detectable LMCAD that appears to be related to these patients’ higher incidence of co-morbidities rather than the left main stenosis itself.
Keywords
PCI , Confidence interval , Hazard ratio , Approach , IVUS , Percutaneous coronary intervention , CABG , CI , intravascular ultrasound , HR , coronary artery bypass grafting , Alberta Provincial Project for Outcomes Assessment in Coronary Heart Disease , LMCAD , left main coronary artery disease
Journal title
JACC (Journal of the American College of Cardiology)
Serial Year
2006
Journal title
JACC (Journal of the American College of Cardiology)
Record number
471887
Link To Document