• Title of article

    Efficacy and Safety of Enoxaparin Versus Unfractionated Heparin in Patients With ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction Also Treated With Clopidogrel Original Research Article

  • Author/Authors

    Marc S. Sabatine، نويسنده , , David A. Morrow، نويسنده , , Anthony Dalby، نويسنده , , Mathias Pfisterer، نويسنده , , Tibor Duris، نويسنده , , Jose Lopez-Sendon، نويسنده , , Sabina A. Murphy، نويسنده , , Runlin Gao، نويسنده , , Elliott M. Antman، نويسنده , , Eugene Braunwald and ExTRACT-TIMI 25 Investigators، نويسنده ,

  • Issue Information
    روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2007
  • Pages
    8
  • From page
    2256
  • To page
    2263
  • Abstract
    Objectives The purpose of this study was to determine the efficacy and safety of enoxaparin (ENOX) versus unfractionated heparin (UFH) in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) receiving fibrinolytic therapy with and without clopidogrel. Background The efficacy and safety of ENOX and clopidogrel given together in STEMI remains to be defined. Methods We compared the rates of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) as well as the rates of bleeding in medically managed patients randomized to ENOX versus UFH in the ExTRACT-TIMI 25 (Enoxaparin and Thrombolysis Reperfusion for Acute Myocardial Infarction Treatment–Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction 25) trial, stratified by concomitant clopidogrel use. Results Enoxaparin significantly reduced the rate of the composite of death, recurrent myocardial infarction, myocardial ischemia, or stroke, compared with UFH, both in patients (n = 2,173) treated with clopidogrel (10.8% vs. 13.9%, adjusted odds ratio [ORadj] 0.70, p = 0.013) and in patients (n = 12,918) not treated with clopidogrel (13.3% vs. 15.3%, ORadj 0.85, p = 0.003) with no evidence of heterogeneity (pinteraction = 0.21). The excess risk of TIMI major bleeding with ENOX versus UFH was numerically but not statistically significantly higher in patients treated with clopidogrel (2.7% vs. 1.0%) versus those who were not (2.1% vs. 1.2%) (pinteraction = 0.61). Net clinical benefit (MACE and major bleeding) favored treatment with ENOX over UFH, either with concomitant clopidogrel (absolute risk reduction 2.4%, 95% confidence interval [CI] −0.5% to 5.3%) or without (absolute risk reduction 1.7%, 95% CI 0.5% to 3.0%) (pinteraction = 0.61). Conclusions In patients with STEMI receiving fibrinolytic therapy, the net benefit of ENOX is similar in patients who are and are not treated with clopidogrel. The totality of trial data suggest that the combination of a fibrinolytic, aspirin, clopidogrel, and ENOX offers an attractive pharmacologic reperfusion strategy in STEMI.
  • Keywords
    myocardial infarction , PCI , intracranial hemorrhage , mace , MI , Percutaneous coronary intervention , Enoxaparin , STEMI , ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction , ICH , LMWH , low-molecular-weight heparin , UFH , unfractionated heparin , major adverse cardiovascular event , ENOX
  • Journal title
    JACC (Journal of the American College of Cardiology)
  • Serial Year
    2007
  • Journal title
    JACC (Journal of the American College of Cardiology)
  • Record number

    472594