• Title of article

    Olmesartan, But Not Amlodipine, Improves Endothelium-Dependent Coronary Dilation in Hypertensive Patients Original Research Article

  • Author/Authors

    Masanao Naya، نويسنده , , Takahiro Tsukamoto، نويسنده , , Koichi Morita، نويسنده , , Chietsugu Katoh، نويسنده , , Tomoo Furumoto، نويسنده , , Satoshi Fujii، نويسنده , , Nagara Tamaki، نويسنده , , Hiroyuki Tsutsui، نويسنده ,

  • Issue Information
    روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2007
  • Pages
    6
  • From page
    1144
  • To page
    1149
  • Abstract
    Objectives We aimed to compare the effects of the angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB) olmesartan versus the calcium channel blocker (CCB) amlodipine on coronary endothelial dysfunction in patients with hypertension. Background Angiotensin II receptor blockers are thought to have greater beneficial effects than CCBs on coronary vasomotion by directly blocking action of angiotensin II. Methods Twenty-six patients with untreated essential hypertension were prospectively assigned to treatment with either olmesartan (27.7 ± 12.4 mg/day, n = 13) or amlodipine (5.6 ± 1.5 mg/day, n = 13) for 12 weeks. Changes of corrected myocardial blood flow (ΔMBF) and coronary vascular resistance (ΔCVR) from rest to cold pressor were measured by using 15O-water and positron emission tomography before and after treatment. Blood biomarkers including lipids, glucose, insulin, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein, interleukin-6, tumor necrosis factor-alpha, and superoxide dismutase (SOD) were also measured. Results Olmesartan and amlodipine reduced blood pressure (BP) to the same extent (−28.7 ± 16.2 mm Hg vs. −26.7 ± 10.8 mm Hg). In the olmesartan group, ΔMBF tended to be greater (−0.15 ± 0.19 ml/g/min vs. 0.03 ± 0.17 ml/g/min, p = 0.09 by 2-way analysis of variance), and ΔCVR was significantly decreased (7.9 ± 23.5 mm Hg/[ml/g/min] vs. −16.6 ± 18.0 mm Hg/[ml/g/min], p < 0.05) after treatment, whereas these parameters did not change in the amlodipine group (ΔMBF: −0.15 ± 0.12 ml/g/min vs. −0.12 ± 0.20 ml/g/min; ΔCVR: 6.5 ± 18.2 mm Hg/[ml/g/min] vs. 4.8 ± 23.4 mm Hg/[ml/g/min]). Serum SOD activity tended to increase (4.74 ± 4.77 U/ml vs. 5.57 ± 4.74 U/ml, p = 0.07 by 2-way analysis of variance) only in the olmesartan group. Conclusions Olmesartan, but not amlodipine, improved endothelium-dependent coronary dilation in hypertensive patients independent of BP reduction. These beneficial effects on coronary vasomotion might be via an antioxidant property of ARBs.
  • Keywords
    blood pressure , PET , Interleukin , positron emission tomography , superoxide dismutase , tumor necrosis factor , TNF , SOD , CPT , Cold Pressor Test , Calcium channel blocker , HOMA-IR , ARB , BP , MBF , myocardial blood flow , angiotensin II receptor blocker , IL , CCB , CVR , coronary vascular resistance , RPP , rate pressure product , homeostasis model assessment for insulin resistance , 15O-water , oxygen-15–labeled water
  • Journal title
    JACC (Journal of the American College of Cardiology)
  • Serial Year
    2007
  • Journal title
    JACC (Journal of the American College of Cardiology)
  • Record number

    472788