Title of article
Carotid Artery Revascularization in High-Surgical-Risk Patients Using the Carotid WALLSTENT and FilterWire EX/EZ: 1-Year Outcomes in the BEACH Pivotal Group Original Research Article
Author/Authors
Sriram S. Iyer، نويسنده , , Christopher J. White، نويسنده , , L. Nelson Hopkins، نويسنده , , Barry T. Katzen، نويسنده , , Robert Safian، نويسنده , , Mark H. Wholey، نويسنده , , William A. Gray، نويسنده , , Rocco Ciocca، نويسنده , , William B. Bachinsky، نويسنده , , Gary Ansel، نويسنده , , James D. Joye، نويسنده , , Mary E. Russell and BEACH Investigators، نويسنده ,
Issue Information
روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2008
Pages
8
From page
427
To page
434
Abstract
Objectives
The multicenter, single-arm BEACH (Boston Scientific EPI: A Carotid Stenting Trial for High-Risk Surgical Patients) evaluated outcomes in high-surgical-risk patients with carotid artery stenosis treated with the Carotid WALLSTENT plus FilterWire EX/EZ Emboli Protection System (Boston Scientific, Natick, Massachusetts).
Background
Carotid artery stent (CAS) placement offers a less invasive alternative for high-risk surgical carotid endarterectomy (CEA) patients.
Methods
The trial enrolled 480 pivotal patients who were candidates for carotid revascularization but considered high surgical risk due to pre-specified anatomic criteria and/or medical comorbidities. The primary end point (all stroke, death, or Q-wave myocardial infarction [MI] through 30 days; non–Q-wave MI through 24 h; and ipsilateral stroke or neurologic death through 1 year) was compared with a proportionally weighted objective performance criterion (OPC) of 12.6% for published surgical endarterectomy results in similar patients, plus a pre-specified noninferiority margin of 4%.
Results
Among pivotal patients, 41.2% were at high surgical risk due to comorbid risk factors, and 58.8% due to anatomic risk factors; 76.7% were asymptomatic with flow-limiting carotid stenosis >80%. At 1 year, the composite primary end point occurred in 8.9% (40 of 447), with a repeat revascularization rate of 4.7%. With an upper 95% confidence limit of 11.5% for the primary composite end point, the BEACH trial results met the pre-specified criteria for noninferiority relative to the calculated OPC plus noninferiority margin (16.6%) for historical surgical CEA outcomes in similar patients (p < 0.0001 for noninferiority).
Conclusions
The BEACH trial results demonstrate that CAS with the WALLSTENT plus FilterWire embolic protection is non-inferior (equivalent or better than) to CEA at 1-year in high-surgical-risk patients (Boston Scientific Embolic Protection, Inc. [EPI]: A Carotid Stenting Trial for High-Risk Surgical Patients [BEACH]; http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00316108?term=NCT00316108&rank=1; NCT00316108).
Keywords
CAS , myocardial infarction , CCA , Confidence interval , Food and Drug Administration , MI , Internal carotid artery , FDA , ICA , CEA , common carotid artery , carotid endarterectomy , CI , OPC , PSV , peak systolic velocity , carotid artery stent/stenting , NIHSS , National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale , objective performance criterion
Journal title
JACC (Journal of the American College of Cardiology)
Serial Year
2008
Journal title
JACC (Journal of the American College of Cardiology)
Record number
473068
Link To Document