Title of article :
Carotid Artery Revascularization in High-Surgical-Risk Patients Using the Carotid WALLSTENT and FilterWire EX/EZ: 1-Year Outcomes in the BEACH Pivotal Group Original Research Article
Author/Authors :
Sriram S. Iyer، نويسنده , , Christopher J. White، نويسنده , , L. Nelson Hopkins، نويسنده , , Barry T. Katzen، نويسنده , , Robert Safian، نويسنده , , Mark H. Wholey، نويسنده , , William A. Gray، نويسنده , , Rocco Ciocca، نويسنده , , William B. Bachinsky، نويسنده , , Gary Ansel، نويسنده , , James D. Joye، نويسنده , , Mary E. Russell and BEACH Investigators، نويسنده ,
Issue Information :
روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2008
Pages :
8
From page :
427
To page :
434
Abstract :
Objectives The multicenter, single-arm BEACH (Boston Scientific EPI: A Carotid Stenting Trial for High-Risk Surgical Patients) evaluated outcomes in high-surgical-risk patients with carotid artery stenosis treated with the Carotid WALLSTENT plus FilterWire EX/EZ Emboli Protection System (Boston Scientific, Natick, Massachusetts). Background Carotid artery stent (CAS) placement offers a less invasive alternative for high-risk surgical carotid endarterectomy (CEA) patients. Methods The trial enrolled 480 pivotal patients who were candidates for carotid revascularization but considered high surgical risk due to pre-specified anatomic criteria and/or medical comorbidities. The primary end point (all stroke, death, or Q-wave myocardial infarction [MI] through 30 days; non–Q-wave MI through 24 h; and ipsilateral stroke or neurologic death through 1 year) was compared with a proportionally weighted objective performance criterion (OPC) of 12.6% for published surgical endarterectomy results in similar patients, plus a pre-specified noninferiority margin of 4%. Results Among pivotal patients, 41.2% were at high surgical risk due to comorbid risk factors, and 58.8% due to anatomic risk factors; 76.7% were asymptomatic with flow-limiting carotid stenosis >80%. At 1 year, the composite primary end point occurred in 8.9% (40 of 447), with a repeat revascularization rate of 4.7%. With an upper 95% confidence limit of 11.5% for the primary composite end point, the BEACH trial results met the pre-specified criteria for noninferiority relative to the calculated OPC plus noninferiority margin (16.6%) for historical surgical CEA outcomes in similar patients (p < 0.0001 for noninferiority). Conclusions The BEACH trial results demonstrate that CAS with the WALLSTENT plus FilterWire embolic protection is non-inferior (equivalent or better than) to CEA at 1-year in high-surgical-risk patients (Boston Scientific Embolic Protection, Inc. [EPI]: A Carotid Stenting Trial for High-Risk Surgical Patients [BEACH]; http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00316108?term=NCT00316108&rank=1; NCT00316108).
Keywords :
CAS , myocardial infarction , CCA , Confidence interval , Food and Drug Administration , MI , Internal carotid artery , FDA , ICA , CEA , common carotid artery , carotid endarterectomy , CI , OPC , PSV , peak systolic velocity , carotid artery stent/stenting , NIHSS , National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale , objective performance criterion
Journal title :
JACC (Journal of the American College of Cardiology)
Serial Year :
2008
Journal title :
JACC (Journal of the American College of Cardiology)
Record number :
473068
Link To Document :
بازگشت