Title of article :
Revascularization for Unprotected Left Main Stem Coronary Artery Stenosis: Stenting or Surgery Review Article
Author/Authors :
David P. Taggart، نويسنده , , Sanjay Kaul، نويسنده , , William E. Boden، نويسنده , , T. Bruce Ferguson Jr، نويسنده , , Robert A. Guyton، نويسنده , , Michael J. Mack، نويسنده , , Paul T. Sergeant، نويسنده , , Richard J. Shemin، نويسنده , , Peter K. Smith، نويسنده , , Salim Yusuf، نويسنده ,
Issue Information :
روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2008
Abstract :
For coronary artery disease with unprotected left main stem (LMS) stenosis, coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is traditionally regarded as the “standard of care” because of its well-documented and durable survival advantage. There is now an increasing trend to use drug-eluting stents for LMS stenosis rather than CABG despite very little high-quality data to inform clinical practice. We herein: 1) evaluate the current evidence in support of the use of percutaneous revascularization for unprotected LMS; 2) assess the underlying justification for randomized controlled trials of stenting versus surgery for unprotected LMS; and 3) examine the optimum approach to informed consent. We conclude that CABG should indeed remain the preferred revascularization treatment in good surgical candidates with unprotected LMS stenosis.
Keywords :
CAD , PCI , coronary artery disease , DES , Randomized controlled trial , mace , LMS , RCT , Percutaneous coronary intervention , CABG , ACC/AHA , American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association , coronary artery bypass grafting , drug-eluting stent(s) , IMA , internal mammary artery , BMS , major adverse coronary events , left main stem , bare-metal stent(s)
Journal title :
JACC (Journal of the American College of Cardiology)
Journal title :
JACC (Journal of the American College of Cardiology)