Title of article :
Randomized Controlled Trial of an Implantable Continuous Hemodynamic Monitor in Patients With Advanced Heart Failure: The COMPASS-HF Study Original Research Article
Author/Authors :
Robert C. Bourge، نويسنده , , William T. Abraham، نويسنده , , Philip B. Adamson، نويسنده , , Mark F. Aaron، نويسنده , , Juan M. Aranda Jr، نويسنده , , Anthony Magalski، نويسنده , , Michael R. Zile، نويسنده , , Andrew L. Smith، نويسنده , , Frank W. Smart، نويسنده , , Mark A. O’Shaughnessy، نويسنده , , Mariell L. Jessup، نويسنده , , Brandon Sparks، نويسنده , , David L. Naftel، نويسنده , , Lynne Warner Stevenson and COMPASS-HF Study Group، نويسنده ,
Issue Information :
روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2008
Pages :
7
From page :
1073
To page :
1079
Abstract :
Objectives The purpose of this study was to determine whether a heart failure (HF) management strategy using continuous intracardiac pressure monitoring could decrease HF morbidity. Background Patients with HF may experience frequent decompensations that require hospitalization despite intensive treatment and follow-up. Methods The COMPASS-HF (Chronicle Offers Management to Patients with Advanced Signs and Symptoms of Heart Failure) study was a prospective, multicenter, randomized, single-blind, parallel-controlled trial of 274 New York Heart Association functional class III or IV HF patients who received an implantable continuous hemodynamic monitor. Patients were randomized to a Chronicle (Medtronic Inc., Minneapolis, Minnesota) (n = 134) or control (n = 140) group. All patients received optimal medical therapy, but the hemodynamic information from the monitor was used to guide patient management only in the Chronicle group. Primary end points included freedom from system-related complications, freedom from pressure-sensor failure, and reduction in the rate of HF-related events (hospitalizations and emergency or urgent care visits requiring intravenous therapy). Results The 2 safety end points were met with no pressure-sensor failures and system-related complications in only 8% of the 277 patients who underwent implantation (all but 4 complications were successfully resolved). The primary efficacy end point was not met because the Chronicle group had a nonsignificant 21% lower rate of all HF-related events compared with the control group (p = 0.33). A retrospective analysis of the time to first HF hospitalization showed a 36% reduction (p = 0.03) in the relative risk of a HF-related hospitalization in the Chronicle group. Conclusions The implantable continuous hemodynamic monitor-guided care did not significantly reduce total HF-related events compared with optimal medical management. Additional trials will be necessary to establish the clinical benefit of implantable continuous hemodynamic monitor-guided care in patients with advanced HF.
Keywords :
CRT , heart failure , ejection fraction , ICD , Hf , NYHA , New York Heart Association , EF , implantable cardioverter-defibrillator , cardiac resynchronization therapy , ePAD , estimated pulmonary artery diastolic pressure , ICHM , implantable continuous hemodynamic monitor
Journal title :
JACC (Journal of the American College of Cardiology)
Serial Year :
2008
Journal title :
JACC (Journal of the American College of Cardiology)
Record number :
473176
Link To Document :
بازگشت