Title of article :
Diagnostic Accuracy of 64-Slice Computed Tomography Coronary Angiography: A Prospective, Multicenter, Multivendor Study Original Research Article
Author/Authors :
W. Bob Meijboom، نويسنده , , Matthijs F.L. Meijs، نويسنده , , Joanne D. Schuijf، نويسنده , , Maarten J. Cramer، نويسنده , , Nico R. Mollet، نويسنده , , Carlos A.G. van Mieghem، نويسنده , , † Koen Nieman، نويسنده , , Jacob M. van Werkhoven، نويسنده , , Gabija Pundziute، نويسنده , , Annick C. Weustink، نويسنده , , Alexander M. de Vos، نويسنده , , Francesca Pugliese، نويسنده , , Benno Rensing، نويسنده , , J. Wouter Jukema، نويسنده , , Jeroen J. Bax، نويسنده , , Mathias Prokop، نويسنده , , Pieter A. Doevendans، نويسنده , , Myriam G.M. Hunink، نويسنده , , * Gabriel P. Krestin، نويسنده , , Pim J. De Feyter، نويسنده ,
Abstract :
Objectives
This study sought to determine the diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice computed tomographic coronary angiography (CTCA) to detect or rule out significant coronary artery disease (CAD).
Background
CTCA is emerging as a noninvasive technique to detect coronary atherosclerosis.
Methods
We conducted a prospective, multicenter, multivendor study involving 360 symptomatic patients with acute and stable anginal syndromes who were between 50 and 70 years of age and were referred for diagnostic conventional coronary angiography (CCA) from September 2004 through June 2006. All patients underwent a nonenhanced calcium scan and a CTCA, which was compared with CCA. No patients or segments were excluded because of impaired image quality attributable to either coronary motion or calcifications. Patient-, vessel-, and segment-based sensitivities and specificities were calculated to detect or rule out significant CAD, defined as ≥50% lumen diameter reduction.
Results
The prevalence among patients of having at least 1 significant stenosis was 68%. In a patient-based analysis, the sensitivity for detecting patients with significant CAD was 99% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 98% to 100%), specificity was 64% (95% CI: 55% to 73%), positive predictive value was 86% (95% CI: 82% to 90%), and negative predictive value was 97% (95% CI: 94% to 100%). In a segment-based analysis, the sensitivity was 88% (95% CI: 85% to 91%), specificity was 90% (95% CI: 89% to 92%), positive predictive value was 47% (95% CI: 44% to 51%), and negative predictive value was 99% (95% CI: 98% to 99%).
Conclusions
Among patients in whom a decision had already been made to obtain CCA, 64-slice CTCA was reliable for ruling out significant CAD in patients with stable and unstable anginal syndromes. A positive 64-slice CTCA scan often overestimates the severity of atherosclerotic obstructions and requires further testing to guide patient management.
Keywords :
computed tomography , Coronary Artery Disease , Coronary Angiography , Prospective , multicenter