Title of article :
randomized trial of low osmolar ionic versus nonionic contrast medi in patients with myocardial infarction or unstable angin undergoing percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty
Author/Authors :
Cindy L. Grines، نويسنده , , Theodore L. Schreiber، نويسنده , , Vicky Savas، نويسنده , , Denise E. Jones، نويسنده , , Frank J. Zidar، نويسنده , , Vellappillil Gangadharan، نويسنده , , Marc Brodsky، نويسنده , , Robert Levin، نويسنده , , Robert Safian، نويسنده , , Sylvi Puchrowicz-Ochocki، نويسنده , , Mark D. Castellani، نويسنده , , William W. OʹNeill، نويسنده ,
Issue Information :
روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 1996
Pages :
6
From page :
1381
To page :
1386
Abstract :
Objectives. The purpose of this study was to determine prospectively whether the differences in anticoagulant and antiplatelet effects of ionic and nonionic contrast medi alter angiographic or clinical outcomes in patients with unstable ischemic syndromes undergoing percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. Background. The interaction of platelets and thrombin with the endothelium of injured vessels contributes to thrombosis and restenosis after coronary angioplasty. Case reports and retrospective observations have reported an increased risk of thrombosis with the use of nonionic contrast media. Methods. total of 211 patients with acute myocardial infarction or unstable angin undergoing coronary angioplasty were randomized to receive nonionic or ionic low osmolar contrast media. Coronary angiograms were assessed by technician blinded to the study contrast media, and clinical events were monitored by an independent nurse for 1 month. Results. Patients receiving the ionic medi were significantly less likely to experience decreased blood flow during the procedure (8.1% vs. 17.8%, P = 0.04). After the angioplasty, residual stenosis, vessel patency, the incidence of moderate to large thrombi and use of adjunctive thrombolytic therapy were similar between the two groups. However, patients receiving ionic medi had fewer recurrent ischemic events requiring repeat catheterization (3.0% vs. 11.4%, P = 0.02) and repeat angioplasty during the initial hospital stay (1.0% vs. 5.8%, P = 0.06). One month after angioplasty, patients receiving ionic contrast medi reported significantly fewer symptoms of any angin (8.5 vs. 20.0%, P = 0.04) or of angin at rest (1.4% vs. 11.8%, P = 0.01) and reduced need for subsequent bypass surgery (0% vs. 5.9%, P = 0.04), compared with patients receiving the nonionic media. Conclusions. These findings demonstrate that in patients with unstable ischemic syndromes undergoing coronary angioplasty, the use of ionic low osmolar contrast medi reduces the risk of ischemic complications acutely and at 1 mouth after the procedure. Therefore, low osmolar ionic contrast medi should be strongly certified when performing interventions in patients with unstable angin or myocardial infarction.
Journal title :
JACC (Journal of the American College of Cardiology)
Serial Year :
1996
Journal title :
JACC (Journal of the American College of Cardiology)
Record number :
479542
Link To Document :
بازگشت