Title of article :
Comparative Usefulness of Myocardial Velocity Gradient in Detecting Ischemic Myocardium by Dobutamine Challenge
Author/Authors :
Hiroshi Tsutsui MD، نويسنده , , Masaaki Uematsu MD PhD، نويسنده , , Hiromi Shimizu MD، نويسنده , , Masakazu Yamagishi MD PhD، نويسنده , , FACC، نويسنده , , Norio Tanak BS، نويسنده , , Hisao Matsud MD PhD، نويسنده , , Kunio Miyatake MD PhD، نويسنده , , FACC، نويسنده ,
Issue Information :
روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 1998
Pages :
5
From page :
89
To page :
93
Abstract :
Objectives. We tested the hypothesis that ischemic myocardium can be sensitively detected using tissue Doppler-derived myocardial velocity gradient (MVG) by dobutamine challenge. Background. Although tissue Doppler imaging (TDI) has recently emerged to quantify regional myocardial contraction, increased translational motion during dobutamine challenge may affect the measurements. MVG is an indicator of regional myocardial contraction independent of the translational motion. Methods. We studied 19 patients with (n = 13) and without (n = 6) confirmed single-vessel coronary artery disease. Left ventricular short-axis tissue Doppler images were obtained along with conventional echocardiograms during submaximal two-step dobutamine challenge (10 and 30 μg/kg body weight per min). Endocardial velocity as well as MVG were derived from TDI using computer analysis in the anteroseptal and posterior segments and were compared with visual interpretation. Results. MVG demonstrated significant dose-responsive increase in the nonischemic segments (anteroseptal: 2.6 ± 0.8/s to 6.0 ± 1.0/s [mean ± SD], p < 0.05; posterior: 3.9 ± 0.7/s to 7.6 ± 1.8/s, p < 0.05) but remained unchanged in the ischemic segments (anteroseptal: 2.5 ± 0.8/s to 2.7 ± 0.7/s, p = NS; posterior: 3.4 ± 1.0/s to 4.1 ± 0.9/s, p = NS). Endocardial velocity failed to clearly demonstrate the differing responses between the nonischemic (anteroseptal: −2.3 ± 1.2 to −2.7 ± 1.6 cm/s, p = NS; posterior: 3.8 ± 1.1 to 7.3 ± 2.7 cm/s, p < 0.05) and ischemic segments (anteroseptal: −2.1 ± 0.5 to −2.8 ± 0.8 cm/s, p = NS; posterior: 4.2 ± 0.8 to 6.5 ± 2.6 cm/s, p = NS). Wall motion abnormality was hardly detectable with visual interpretation (wall motion score range 1.00 to 1.33). Conclusions. Abnormal segments could be sensitively detected by using MVG in submaximal dobutamine challenge, even where conventional methods failed to detect the abnormality.
Keywords :
ECG , TDI , Electrocardiogram , Tissue Doppler imaging , electrocardiographic , MVG , myocardial velocity gradient
Journal title :
JACC (Journal of the American College of Cardiology)
Serial Year :
1998
Journal title :
JACC (Journal of the American College of Cardiology)
Record number :
480519
Link To Document :
بازگشت