Title of article :
Coronary collateral quantitation in patients with coronary artery disease using intravascular flow velocity or pressure measurements
Author/Authors :
Christian Seiler، نويسنده , , Martin Fleisch، نويسنده , , Ali Garachemani، نويسنده , , Bernhard Meier، نويسنده ,
Issue Information :
روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 1998
Abstract :
Objectives. This study evaluated two methods for the quantitative measurement of collaterals using intracoronary (IC) blood flow velocity or pressure measurements.
Background. The extent of myocardial necrosis after coronary artery occlusion is substantially influenced by the collateral circulation. So far, qualitative methods have been available to assess the human coronary collateral circulation, thus restraining the conclusive investigation of, for example, therapies to promote collateral development.
Methods. Fifty-one patients with coronary artery stenosis to be treated by percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) were investigated using IC PTC guidewire-based Doppler and pressure sensors positioned distal to the stenosis. Simultaneous measurements of aortic pressure, IC velocity and pressure distal to the stenosis during and after PTC provided the variables for calculating collateral flow indices (CFIv and CFIp) that express collateral flow as fraction of flow vi the patent vessel. Both CFIv and CFIp were compared with conventional methods for collateral assessment, among them ST-segment changes >1 mm on IC and surface electrocardiogram (ECG) at PTCA. Also, CFIv and CFIp were compared with each other.
Results. In 11 patients without ECG signs of ischemi during PTC (sufficient collaterals), relative collateral flow amounted to 46% as determined by Doppler and pressure wire. Patients with insufficient collaterals (n = 40) had relative collateral flow values of 18%. Using threshold of CFI = 30%, sufficient and insufficient collaterals could be diagnosed with 100% sensitivity and 93% specificity by IC Doppler, and 75% sensitivity and 92% specificity by IC pressure measurements. The agreement between Doppler and pressure measurements was good: CFIv = 0.08 + 0.8 CFIp, r = 0.80, p = 0.0001.
Conclusions. Intracoronary flow velocity or pressure measurements during routine PTC represent an accurate and, at last, quantitative method for assessing the coronary collateral circulation in humans.
Keywords :
CAD , IC , coronary artery disease , PTCA , CVP , percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty , coronary flow velocity reserve , CFVR , central venous pressure , Pao , mean aortic pressure , Poccl , intracoronary , Vioccl , Vi?-occl , CFIp , pressure-derived collateral flow index , CFIv , velocity-derived collateral flow index , distal IC occlusive or coronary wedge pressure , flow velocity time integral obtained distal to the occluded stenosis , flow velocity time integral obtained distal to the dilated stenosis
Journal title :
JACC (Journal of the American College of Cardiology)
Journal title :
JACC (Journal of the American College of Cardiology)