Title of article :
In-hospital versus out-of-hospital presentation of life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias predicts survival : Results from the AVID registry
Author/Authors :
Andrew E. Epstein، نويسنده , , Judy Powell، نويسنده , , Qing Yao، نويسنده , , Celeste Ocampo، نويسنده , , Scott Lancaster، نويسنده , , Yves Rosenberg، نويسنده , , David S. Cannom، نويسنده , , John M. Herre، نويسنده , , H. Leon Greene and AFFIRM Investigators، نويسنده , , the AVID Investigators، نويسنده ,
Issue Information :
روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 1999
Abstract :
OBJECTIVES
This study describes the outcomes of patients from the Antiarrhythmics Versus Implantable Defibrillators (AVID) Study Registry to determine how the location of ventricular arrhythmi presentation influences survival.
BACKGROUND
Most studies of cardiac arrest report outcome following out-of-hospital resuscitation. In contrast, there are minimal dat on long-term outcome following in-hospital cardiac arrest.
METHODS
The AVID Study was multicenter, randomized comparison of drug and defibrillator strategies to treat life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias. Registry was maintained of all patients with sustained ventricular arrhythmias at each study site. The present study includes patients who had AVID-eligible arrhythmias, both randomized and not randomized. Patients with in-hospital and out-of-hospital presentations are compared. Dat on long-term mortality were obtained through the National Death Index.
RESULTS
The unadjusted mortality rates at one- and two-year follow-ups were 23% and 31.1% for patients with in-hospital presentations, and 10.5% and 16.8% for those with out-of-hospital presentations (p < 0.001), respectively. The adjusted mortality rates at one- and two-year follow-ups were 14.8% and 20.9% for patients with in-hospital presentations, and 8.4% and 14.1% for those with out-of-hospital presentations (p < 0.001), respectively. The adjusted long-term relative risk for in-hospital versus out-of-hospital presentation was 1.6 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.3–1.9).
CONCLUSIONS
Compared with patients with out-of-hospital presentations of life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias not due to reversible cause, patients with in-hospital presentations have worse long-term prognosis. Because location of ventricular arrhythmi presentation is an independent predictor of long-term outcome, it should be considered as an element of risk stratification and when planning clinical trials
Keywords :
ICD , Vf , ventricular fibrillation , VT , implantable cardioverter-defibrillator , ventricular tachycardi , Antiarrhythmics Versus Implantable Defibrillators study , AVID Study
Journal title :
JACC (Journal of the American College of Cardiology)
Journal title :
JACC (Journal of the American College of Cardiology)