Author/Authors :
Linnea M. Baudhuin، نويسنده , , Stacy J. Hartman، نويسنده , , John F. OʹBrien، نويسنده , , Irene Meissner، نويسنده , , Robert S. Galen، نويسنده , , Jennie N. Ward، نويسنده , , Scott M. Hogen، نويسنده , , Earl. L. Branum، نويسنده , , Joseph P. McConnell، نويسنده ,
Abstract :
Objectives: Elevated plasma lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] is a significant risk factor for vascular disease. Standardization of Lp(a) mass measurement is complicated by the heterogeneity of apolipoprotein(a) [apo(a)]. We investigated whether Lp(a) cholesterol measurement, which is not influenced by apo(a) size, is a viable alternative to measuring Lp(a) mass.
Design and methods: Plasma Lp(a) cholesterol was measured electrophoretically, with and without ultracentrifugation, and results were compared to each other and to immunoturbidimetrically measured Lp(a) mass in 470 subjects.
Results: Ultracentrifuged and whole plasma Lp(a) cholesterol levels demonstrated high correlation (R = 0.964). All samples with detectable (≥2.0 mg/dl) Lp(a) cholesterol had Lp(a) mass >30 mg/dl (the clinically relevant cutpoint), while 59 samples with Lp(a) mass >30 mg/dl did not have detectable Lp(a) cholesterol.
Conclusions: Lp(a) cholesterol can be measured in whole plasma without interference from VLDL lipoproteins. The relative clinical merits of measuring Lp(a) cholesterol vs. Lp(a) mass or both in combination deserves investigation
Keywords :
lipoprotein(a) , apolipoprotein(a) , Ultracentrifugation , Lp(a) cholesterol , Lp(a) mass