• Title of article

    Back strength cannot be predicted accurately from anthropometric measures in subjects with and without chronic low back pain

  • Author/Authors

    Christian Larivière، نويسنده , , Denis Gravel، نويسنده , , Denis Gagnon، نويسنده , , A. Bertrand Arsenault، نويسنده , , Patrick Loisel، نويسنده , , Yves Lepage، نويسنده ,

  • Issue Information
    روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2003
  • Pages
    7
  • From page
    473
  • To page
    479
  • Abstract
    Objectives. (1) To develop a multiple regression equation using anthropometric measurements to predict back strength and (2) to estimate the effect of practice on the back strength results and back strength predictions. Design. Comparative study with repeated measures performed on three days. Background. The assessment of back muscle relative endurance (% maximal strength) requires the measurement of maximal back strength which is problematic with low back pain patients. Methods. The back strength (L5/S1 static extension moment), age and 26 anthropometric parameters were obtained from 83 male volunteers [42 healthy subjects and 41 chronic low back pain patients] aged between 20 and 60 years. A subsample of 20 healthy subjects and 20 patients were assessed through three days of testing to evaluate the variations of back strength with practice. Results. The final regression model (n=42 healthy subjects) explained 39% of the variance in back strength. Back strength increased with practice (Day1
  • Keywords
    Dynamometry , Strength , Back muscle , low back pain , L5/S1 extension torque , Anthropometry , motor learning , Fat free mass
  • Journal title
    Clinical Biomechanics
  • Serial Year
    2003
  • Journal title
    Clinical Biomechanics
  • Record number

    486155