• Title of article

    The possibilities of uncemented glenoid component––a finite element study

  • Author/Authors

    S. Gupta، نويسنده , , and F. C. T. van der Helm، نويسنده , , F. Van Keulen، نويسنده ,

  • Issue Information
    روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2004
  • Pages
    11
  • From page
    292
  • To page
    302
  • Abstract
    Objective. (1) Determine the initial stress distributions within an uncemented implanted glenoid during elevation of the arm and to investigate whether failure is caused by stresses generated within this implant–bone structure. (2) Compare stress patterns between the uncemented design and two basic models of cemented prostheses. Design. The uncemented component consists of a polyethylene cup with a metal-backing. All material interfaces were assumed to be fully bonded. Background. Cemented glenoid components have been frequently vulnerable to failure within itself and at the cement–bone interface. A 3-D finite element analysis of an uncemented design is required to investigate whether clinical observations on failure can be better explained with a stress analysis. Methods. A 3-D finite element submodel an uncemented prosthesis was generated using CT-scan data and realistic loading conditions (humeral abduction, 30–180°). The submodelling approach was based on an overall solution of a complete scapula acted upon by all muscles, ligaments and joint reaction forces. Results. High Von Mises stresses (20–70 MPa) were generated in the metal-backing during abduction. Stresses were reduced in the polyethylene cup by 17–20% as compared to the cemented designs. Stresses in the underlying bone were substantially lower than to the natural glenoid. Stress-shielding can be observed in the trabecular bone underlying the prosthesis. The implant–bone interface is secure against interface failure at moderate loads, although the implant–bone (metal–bone) interface around the superior edge of the prosthesis is subject to high stresses (normal: 11.85 MPa, shear: 6.67 MPa) as compared to the cemented prosthesis. Whereas, the cement–bone interface, appears more likely to fail either at locations adjacent to the keel or at locations around the superior edge of the cemented design. The uncemented design therefore appeared to be a reasonable alternative to fixation with cement.
  • Keywords
    Shoulder , Scapula , Glenoid prostheses , Finite element analysis
  • Journal title
    Clinical Biomechanics
  • Serial Year
    2004
  • Journal title
    Clinical Biomechanics
  • Record number

    486271