• Title of article

    Operative treatment of greater tuberosity fractures of the humerus – A biomechanical analysis

  • Author/Authors

    V. Braunstein، نويسنده , , E. Wiedemann، نويسنده , , W. Plitz، نويسنده , , OJ Muensterer، نويسنده , , W. Mutschler، نويسنده , , S. Hinterwimmer، نويسنده ,

  • Issue Information
    روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2007
  • Pages
    6
  • From page
    652
  • To page
    657
  • Abstract
    Background Fractures of the greater tuberosity of the humerus present with increasing frequency. However, no biomechanical data about the optimal fixation technique of greater tuberosity fractures is available. This biomechanical cadaver study compares the stability of three standard fixation techniques used for the treatment of greater tuberosity fractures of the proximal humerus. Methods In 21 fresh frozen proximal humeri, standardized fractures of the greater tuberosity were created. The specimens were randomly assigned to one of three operation techniques: wire tension banding, two cancellous screws and transosseous sutures. These constructs were mechanically tested by applying an increasing force to the supraspinatus tendon. Load to 5 mm displacement (load to 5 mm yield point) and load to failure (maximum stretch strength) were measured in Newton (N). Findings Load to 5 mm yield point values showed no significant differences between tension banding (498 N, SD 153) and two cancellous screws (400 N, SD 174) (P > 0.01). Both techniques showed significantly higher values than transosseous sutures (185 N, SD 132) (P < 0.01). Load to failure values were significantly higher for tension banding (1054 N, SD 125) than screws (842 N, SD 140) and sutures (480 N SD 101) (P < 0.01). The difference between screws and sutures was also significant (P < 0.01). Interpretation Tension banding and two cancellous screws provided the strongest fixation for isolated fractures of the greater tuberosity.
  • Keywords
    Greater tuberosity , Fracture , Operative treatment , biomechanical analysis
  • Journal title
    Clinical Biomechanics
  • Serial Year
    2007
  • Journal title
    Clinical Biomechanics
  • Record number

    486742