Title of article :
Operative treatment of greater tuberosity fractures of the humerus – A biomechanical analysis
Author/Authors :
V. Braunstein، نويسنده , , E. Wiedemann، نويسنده , , W. Plitz، نويسنده , , OJ Muensterer، نويسنده , , W. Mutschler، نويسنده , , S. Hinterwimmer، نويسنده ,
Issue Information :
روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2007
Abstract :
Background
Fractures of the greater tuberosity of the humerus present with increasing frequency. However, no biomechanical data about the optimal fixation technique of greater tuberosity fractures is available. This biomechanical cadaver study compares the stability of three standard fixation techniques used for the treatment of greater tuberosity fractures of the proximal humerus.
Methods
In 21 fresh frozen proximal humeri, standardized fractures of the greater tuberosity were created. The specimens were randomly assigned to one of three operation techniques: wire tension banding, two cancellous screws and transosseous sutures. These constructs were mechanically tested by applying an increasing force to the supraspinatus tendon. Load to 5 mm displacement (load to 5 mm yield point) and load to failure (maximum stretch strength) were measured in Newton (N).
Findings
Load to 5 mm yield point values showed no significant differences between tension banding (498 N, SD 153) and two cancellous screws (400 N, SD 174) (P > 0.01). Both techniques showed significantly higher values than transosseous sutures (185 N, SD 132) (P < 0.01). Load to failure values were significantly higher for tension banding (1054 N, SD 125) than screws (842 N, SD 140) and sutures (480 N SD 101) (P < 0.01). The difference between screws and sutures was also significant (P < 0.01).
Interpretation
Tension banding and two cancellous screws provided the strongest fixation for isolated fractures of the greater tuberosity.
Keywords :
Greater tuberosity , Fracture , Operative treatment , biomechanical analysis
Journal title :
Clinical Biomechanics
Journal title :
Clinical Biomechanics