Title of article :
Influence of condition of surgical margins on local recurrence and disease-specific survival in oral and oropharyngeal cancer
Author/Authors :
J. McMahon، نويسنده , , C. J. O’Brien، نويسنده , , I. Pathak، نويسنده , , R. Hamill، نويسنده , , E. McNeil، نويسنده , , N. Hammersley، نويسنده , , S. Gardiner، نويسنده , , E. Junor، نويسنده ,
Issue Information :
روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2003
Pages :
8
From page :
224
To page :
231
Abstract :
Background: The clearance of surgical margins at the primary site is widely thought to influence the subsequent course of the disease in patients operated on for oral and oropharyngeal carcinoma. In some reports the adverse impact of close or involved margins was not negated by postoperative radiotherapy. These findings, in addition to descriptive histopathological studies, have led some authors to recommend margins of more than a macroscopic clearance of 1 cm at certain subsites. We have therefore examined the relation between the condition of surgical margins and local recurrence and disease-specific survival. Methods: Identical treatment protocols were used to treat two independent groups of patients (Sydney, Australia, n=237; Lanarkshire, n=95) who presented with previously untreated carcinoma of the mouth or oropharynx. All patients were operated on with the primary objective of achieving a macroscopic clearance of 1 cm. Postoperative radiotherapy was used according to a protocol. Data about patients were entered into comprehensive computerised databases prospectively. Known clinical and pathological prognostic indicators, in addition to the condition of surgical margins, were analysed to find out if they were predictive of local recurrence and disease-specific survival using the Cox proportional hazard model. Results: Local recurrence was predicted by the presence of perineural invasion at the primary site in both groups. Disease-specific survival was predicted by the presence and extent of regional lymph node metastases in both groups. The condition of surgical margins (clear, close, or involved) did not predict local recurrence, or disease-specific survival on multivariate analysis. Conclusions: A macroscopic margin of 1 cm seems adequate in the surgical management of oral and oropharyngeal carcinoma. For most patients who have close or involved margins the biology of the disease influences the subsequent course irrespective of the width of clearance of tumour.
Keywords :
ORAL CANCER , tumour , Oropharyngeal cancer
Journal title :
British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial surgery
Serial Year :
2003
Journal title :
British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial surgery
Record number :
492891
Link To Document :
بازگشت