Author/Authors :
J. W. Nicholson، نويسنده , , B. J. Millar، نويسنده , , B. Czarnecka، نويسنده , , H. Limanowska-Shaw، نويسنده ,
Abstract :
Objectives: The aim of this study was to determine the interaction of four polyacid-modified resin composites with aqueous lactic acid solutions, and to compare changes with those for a glass-ionomer cement and a conventional resin composite.
Methods: For each material, namely Compoglass F, Dyract AP, Hytac and Ana Compomer, plus AquaCem (glass-ionomer cement) and Pekafil (conventional composite resin), five cylindrical specimens of 4 mmdiameter×6 mmheight were prepared and weighed. They were stored individually in 2.0 cm3 of 0.02 mol l−1 lactic acid solution for 1 week then the pH was determined and the specimens reweighed. The lactic acid solution was replenished, and the specimens were stored for a further week, after which the pH and specimen weights were again measured. This was repeated at 1 week intervals until the specimens were 6 weeks old. Differences were analysed by ANOVA followed by Newman–Keuls post hoc analysis.
Results: All four polyacid-modified composites increased the pH of the solutions at all time intervals by at least 0.26 pH units (significant to at least p<0.01). This effect was similar to that of the glass-ionomer (but significantly less, p<0.05) while significantly greater (p<0.05) than that for the composite, Pekafil, which, by contrast, had no effect on pH. The observed rise in pH reduced significantly over time (ANOVA, p<0.05). After 1 week, all pH changes were accompanied by net reductions in specimen mass, indicating susceptibility to acid erosion. Hytac was significantly more resistant to this erosion than the other materials; conversely, it had the least effect on solution pH.
Significance: These results show that polyacid-modified resin composites neutralise lactic acid in vitro but suffer erosion in the process.