Title of article :
Continued axillary sampling is unnecessary and provides no further information to sentinel node biopsy in staging breast cancer
Author/Authors :
G.P.H. Gui، نويسنده , , D.J. Joubert، نويسنده , , R. Reichert، نويسنده , , A. Ward، نويسنده , , S. Lakhani، نويسنده , , P. Osin، نويسنده , , A. Nerurkar، نويسنده , , R. AʹHern، نويسنده , , Alvin K. Benson، نويسنده , , S.R. Underwood، نويسنده ,
Issue Information :
روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2005
Pages :
8
From page :
707
To page :
714
Abstract :
Introduction Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) has become increasingly accepted as a diagnostic method to stage the axilla in breast cancer, selecting women with a positive sentinel node for completion axillary clearance. As SLNB became established, many surgeons supplemented SLNB to sample a minimum of four lymph nodes, on the assumption that the four-node technique is supported by randomised trial data. We hypothesised that the practice of undirected sampling to supplement SLNB adds little information to the status of the residual axilla. Methods One hundred and sixty-five patients with early breast cancer were studied. Following successful identification of the sentinel node, 84 women had completion axillary dissection and 81 women had an axillary sample with at least four nodes available for pathological assessment. Results Following successful identification of the sentinel node in 165 patients, the false negative rate (FNR) was 2/44=4.5% (95% CI 0.6–15.5), sensitivity 42/44=95.5% (84.5–99.4) and negative predictive value (NPV) 121/123=98.4% (94.2–99.8). In the axillary dissection cohort, the FNR was 2/26=7.7% (0.9–25.1), sensitivity 24/26=92.3% (74.9–99.1) and NPV 58/60=96.7% (88.5–100). In the axillary sample group, the FNR was 0/18=0% (0–18.5), sensitivity 18/18=100% (81.5–100) and NPV 63/63=100% (94.3–100). The SLNB was the only positive node in 12/26 (46.2%) in the axillary dissection group and 10/18 (55.6%) in the axillary sampling group. There was no patient in the axillary sampling group where the sample node was positive and the sentinel node negative. Conclusion Once SLNB is validated within the multidisciplinary unit, undirected sampling of the axilla following identification of the sentinel node(s) is unnecessary. The additional sampling of non-sentinel nodes has no role to play either in the assessment of a potential false negative SLNB nor as predictive information on the status of the residual axillary nodes.
Keywords :
Axillary dissection , Sentinel lymph node biopsy , Axillary sample , sensitivity
Journal title :
European Journal of Surgical Oncology
Serial Year :
2005
Journal title :
European Journal of Surgical Oncology
Record number :
511028
Link To Document :
بازگشت